Logotipo do repositório

Organic and Synthetic Substitutes in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Scoping Review (2015–2025)

dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Ana Caroline
dc.contributor.authorHolzlsauer, Guilherme Machado [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Lima Parra, João Paulo Ruiz Lucio
dc.contributor.authorCandelária, Raí André Querino
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Thamires Santos
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Nunes Barreto, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiglino, Maria Angelica
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)pt
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-28T19:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-27
dc.description.abstractTracheal defects have been the focus of research since the 19th century, but reconstructing this complex structure remains challenging. Identifying a safe, effective tracheal substitute is a key goal of surgery. This integrative review explores current tracheal substitutes and tissue engineering techniques. Data were collected from June 2024 to March 2025 from electronically available databases. Articles published between 2015 and 2025 were selected using the individualized protocol for each database. After screening 190 articles, 82 were excluded, and 108 were reviewed, with 100 meeting the final inclusion criteria. Recent substitutes include three-dimensional synthetic grafts made from polycaprolactone and copolyamide with thermoplastic elastomer, thermoplastic polyurethane and polylactic acid. Additionally, models using decellularized and recellularized tracheal matrix scaffolds and bioprinting techniques are being developed. Comparative studies of synthetic grafts and tracheal scaffolds, as well as cell self-aggregation methods to create tracheal analogues, are discussed. Advances in hybrid approaches combining synthetic polymers with extracellular matrix components aim to improve biocompatibility and functional integration. The importance of selecting appropriate preclinical animal models, such as goats, is also highlighted for translational relevance. Further research is required to refine protocols, overcome challenges related to vascularization and immune response, and ensure the development of clinically viable, long-lasting tracheal substitutes.
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ/USP), São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil;, anacaroline.santos@usp.br, (A.C.d.S.);, raiandre@usp.br, (R.A.Q.C.)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil;, guilherme.holzlsauer@unesp.br
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Anatomy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marília 17525-902, Brazil;, joao.parra@unesp.br
dc.description.affiliationXenoBr, Rua do Matão, 106, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil;, tssxenobr@gmail.com
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil;, rodrigo.barreto@unesp.br
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, Postgraduate Department, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Animal Health, Production and Environment, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil;, guilherme.holzlsauer@unesp.br
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil;, rodrigo.barreto@unesp.br
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1190478152
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1190478152
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering12070704
dc.identifier.issn0178-2029
dc.identifier.issn2306-5354
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1647-8861
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7575-2117
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7848-8558
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4979-115X
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC12292422
dc.identifier.pmid40722395
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/332229
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofBioengineering; n. 7; v. 12; p. 704
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgold
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleOrganic and Synthetic Substitutes in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Scoping Review (2015–2025)
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
bioengineering-12-00704.pdf
Tamanho:
871,39 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format