Publicação:
Osteoconductivity of modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for bone tissue augmentation and repair

dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.
dc.contributor.authorFaria, P. E. P.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, A.
dc.contributor.authorFelipucci, D. N. B.
dc.contributor.authorReaney, I. M.
dc.contributor.authorSalata, L. A.
dc.contributor.authorBrook, I. M.
dc.contributor.authorHatton, P. V.
dc.contributor.institutionSir Robert Hadfield Building
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Sheffield
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:47Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-01
dc.description.abstractModified fluorcanasite glasses were fabricated by either altering the molar ratios of Na 2O and CaO or by adding P 2O 5 to the parent stoichiometric glass compositions. Glasses were converted to glass-ceramics by a controlled two-stage heat treatment process. Rods (2 mm x 4 mm) were produced using the conventional lost-wax casting technique. Osteoconductive 45S5 bioglass was used as a reference material. Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity were investigated by implantation into healing defects (2 mm) in the midshaft of rabbit femora. Tissue response was investigated using conventional histology and scanning electron microscopy. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of specimens after 12 weeks implantation showed significantly more bone contact with the surface of 45S5 bioglass implants when compared with other test materials. When the bone contact for each material was compared between experimental time points, the Glass-Ceramic 2 (CaO rich) group showed significant difference (p = 0.027) at 4 weeks, but no direct contact at 12 weeks. Histology and backscattered electron photomicrographs showed that modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants had greater osteoconductivity than the parent stoichiometric composition. Of the new materials, fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants modified by the addition of P 2O 5 showed the greatest stimulation of new mineralized bone tissue formation adjacent to the implants after 4 and 12 weeks implantation. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Engineering Materials University of Sheffield Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering School of Clinical Dentistry University of Sheffield, Claremount Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba University of the State of São Paulo, Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo
dc.format.extent760-768
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32750
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, v. 94, n. 3, p. 760-768, 2010.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.a.32750
dc.identifier.issn1549-3296
dc.identifier.issn1552-4965
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77954793403
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71844
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
dc.relation.ispartofjcr3.231
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,933
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject45S5 bioglass
dc.subjectBone tissue
dc.subjectFluorcanasite
dc.subjectGlass-ceramic
dc.subjectIn vivo biocompatibility
dc.subjectOsteoconductivity
dc.subjectBackscattered electrons
dc.subjectBio-glass
dc.subjectBone contacts
dc.subjectDirect contact
dc.subjectGlass compositions
dc.subjectHeat treatment process
dc.subjectIn-vivo
dc.subjectMineralized bone
dc.subjectMolar ratio
dc.subjectNew material
dc.subjectOsteoconductive
dc.subjectReference material
dc.subjectStoichiometric compositions
dc.subjectTest materials
dc.subjectTime points
dc.subjectTissue response
dc.subjectTwo stage
dc.subjectWax casting
dc.subjectBiocompatibility
dc.subjectGlass ceramics
dc.subjectHistology
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectSecondary batteries
dc.subjectSodium
dc.subjectBone
dc.subjectfluorcanasite glass
dc.subjectglass
dc.subjectunclassified drug
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectanimal model
dc.subjectanimal tissue
dc.subjectbiocompatibility
dc.subjectbone defect
dc.subjectbone remodeling
dc.subjectbone tissue augmentation
dc.subjectbone tissue repair
dc.subjectceramics
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfemur shaft
dc.subjecthistopathology
dc.subjectmorphometrics
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectrabbit
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectBiocompatible Materials
dc.subjectBone and Bones
dc.subjectBone Substitutes
dc.subjectCeramics
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectImplants, Experimental
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectRabbits
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectSilicates
dc.titleOsteoconductivity of modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramics for bone tissue augmentation and repairen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções