Logo do repositório

Evaluation of the palatal split pattern in surgically rapid maxillary expansion—comparison of two techniques

dc.contributor.authorMoura, Lucas Borin [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSpin-Neto, Rubens
dc.contributor.authorSverzut, Cássio Edvard
dc.contributor.authorMonnazzi, Marcelo da Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTrivellato, Alexandre Elias
dc.contributor.authorGabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionAarhus University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:02:46Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:02:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion is performed to correct transverse deficiencies of the maxilla, and it is indicated in specific clinical situations. The literature presents different opinions in several aspects, mainly regarding the effect of disjunction of the pterygoid plates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of maxillary expansion obtained with two surgical techniques, with and without disjunction of the pterygoid plates. Methods: Twenty patients treated with surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion for correction of transversal discrepancies were included in this retrospective study and divided into two groups: (G1) patients operated without disjunction of pterygoid plates and (G2) patients treated with release of the pterygoid plates. Results: There were seven male and 13 female patients, and the mean age was 29.9 years. Cone beam computed tomography images obtained after final activation of the expansion device were evaluated and complete disjunction of the midpalatal suture (type I) was present in 75 % of the patients whereas incomplete disjunction of the midpalatal suture (type II) was observed in 25 %. Chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.606). Conclusion: No difference was found in relation to the maxillary disjunction pattern irrespective of the treatment given to pterygoid plates.en
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Dental School at Araraquara – Unesp, Rua: Humaitá, 1680
dc.description.affiliationSection of Oral Radiology Department of Dentistry Faculty of Health Aarhus University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodonthology Dental School at Ribeirão Preto–USP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Dental School at Araraquara – Unesp, Rua: Humaitá, 1680
dc.format.extent255-258
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0562-5
dc.identifier.citationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 20, n. 3, p. 255-258, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10006-016-0562-5
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84966356388.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1865-1569
dc.identifier.issn1865-1550
dc.identifier.lattes8492596401380580
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84966356388
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/172930
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,471
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCranial sutures
dc.subjectLe Fort I osteotomy
dc.subjectMaxilla
dc.subjectPalatal expansion technique
dc.subjectSARME
dc.titleEvaluation of the palatal split pattern in surgically rapid maxillary expansion—comparison of two techniquesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.lattes8492596401380580
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84966356388.pdf
Tamanho:
365.28 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: