Logo do repositório

Guidelines for technogenic landform mapping in the Brazilian Relief Classification System (BRCS)

dc.contributor.authorMoura, Nina Simone Vilaverde
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, Telma Mendes
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, Isabel Cristina Moroz-Caccia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira Peixoto, Maria Naíse
dc.contributor.authorFelippe, Miguel Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos Oliveira, Antônio Manoel
dc.contributor.authorPeloggia, Alex Ubiratan Goossens
dc.contributor.authorNolasco, Marjorie Cseko
dc.contributor.institutionDepto. Geografia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionDepto. Geociências
dc.contributor.institutionPesquisador Independente
dc.contributor.institutionDepto. Geologia
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:00:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work is to discuss the particularity of the classification of technogenic landforms, that is, directly or indirectly derived from human agency, through the studies carried out within the scope of the Brazilian Relief Classification System. Such forms, as an expression of technogenic grounds, are analyzed through the morphostratigraphic, based on their formation processes, configuration, and constituent materials. Such application led to the following results in terms of classification, into two basic levels: (1) Categories, defined according to the geomorphological dynamics, whether additive (elevations or superpositions), subtractive (scars or depressions) or conservative (corrugations and equiforms), the latter differentiated by the occurrence or not of topographic alteration; (2) Types, differentiated according to human agency, whether direct (technoforms) or indirect (geotechnoforms) or even according to the superficial or deep nature of the modifying process (in the case of equiforms). It is concluded that technogenic forms constitute a particular geomorphological category, subject to analysis, classification and mapping using specific methods, and their taxonomic reference is considered in a cross-sectional approach, observing their expression at the level of the sixth, fifth and fourth taxa of Ross (1992); variations in this classification may occur in view of the dimensions of the landscape or classified form.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Depto. Geografia
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Depto. Geografia
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Depto. Geografia
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Depto. Geociências
dc.description.affiliationPesquisador Independente
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana Depto. Geologia
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Depto. Geografia
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.20502/rbg.v24i4.2466
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Geomorfologia, v. 24, n. 4, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.20502/rbg.v24i4.2466
dc.identifier.issn2236-5664
dc.identifier.issn1519-1540
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180933516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/304781
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Geomorfologia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanthropic alterations
dc.subjectgeomorphological mapping
dc.subjecttechnogenic relief patterns
dc.titleGuidelines for technogenic landform mapping in the Brazilian Relief Classification System (BRCS)en
dc.titleDiretrizes para mapeamento de formas de relevo tecnogênicas no Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação do Relevo (SBCR)pt
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5109-7178[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8295-6158[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6156-3446[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5518-1588[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0261-4298[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3666-846X[6]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0004-5496-1795[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6085-1558[8]

Arquivos

Coleções