Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants

dc.contributor.authorGomes-Filho, João Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAurélio, Kamila Guilherme [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Mariana Machado Teixeira De Moraes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBernabé, Pedro Felício Estrada [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T20:39:38Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T20:39:38Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9% sterile saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-μm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25% NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl at this experimental period.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Dental School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Dental School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, 16015-050 Araçatuba, SP
dc.format.extent137-144
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200011
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 137-144, 2008.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1678-77572008000200011
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-42049105515
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/225103
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiocompatibility
dc.subjectChlorhexidine
dc.subjectRoot canal irrigants
dc.subjectSodium hypochlorite
dc.titleComparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigantsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOApt

Arquivos