Logo do repositório

Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Corbels Using Concrete Damage Plasticity: Sensitivity to Material Parameters and Comparison with Analytical Models

dc.contributor.authorNeuberger, Ygor Moriel
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Maykon Vinicius
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Alex Micael Dantas
dc.contributor.authorBandieira, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Júnior, Edivaldo Pereira
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Herisson Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorCatoia, Bruna
dc.contributor.authorBolandim, Emerson Alexandro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Moura Aquino, Vinicius Borges [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorChristoforo, André Luis
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo Ferreira, Marcelo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-01
dc.description.abstractThe Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model is a widely used constitutive model to represent the non-linear behavior of concrete in numerical analysis. However, a limited number of studies compared the level of accuracy of numerical models with the main code provisions from the literature. In addition, the influence of CDP material parameters on the structural behavior of corbels was scarcely studied. This study proposes to evaluate the ability of numerical models using CDP to represent the structural behavior of corbels regarding the ultimate load, reinforcement deformation and failure mechanism. In addition, we compared the predictions of the numerical models with the ones from design code expressions regarding the ultimate capacity. For this, three test results of corbels from the literature were evaluated with numerical models using the CDP, as well as with analytical models from different code provisions. A sensitivity analysis—by changing the dilation angle (ψ) and shape factor (Kc)—was performed. The comparison between tested and predicted resistances with the proposed numerical modeling choices was equal to 1.04 with a coefficient of variation of 11%. On the other hand, the analytical models evaluated overestimated the corbel capacity by more than 62%, on average. Therefore, the proposed modeling choices provide better predictions of ultimate capacity than the evaluated analytical models and can be used to assess the corbel design under more complex boundary conditions.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering Federal University of Sao Carlos
dc.description.affiliationSao Carlos Engineering School University of Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationFederal Institute of Rondonia, Campus Ariquemes, Rondonia
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Ilha Solteira
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Civil Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Ilha Solteira
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112781
dc.identifier.citationBuildings, v. 13, n. 11, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings13112781
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178380267
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/302635
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBuildings
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectconcrete damage plasticity (CDP)
dc.subjectnumerical modeling
dc.subjectregion of stress discontinuity (D region)
dc.subjectreinforced concrete corbels
dc.titleNumerical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Corbels Using Concrete Damage Plasticity: Sensitivity to Material Parameters and Comparison with Analytical Modelsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4001-7248[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0424-4080[3]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0003-1796-6055[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6220-7646[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3483-7506[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4066-080X[10]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Ilha Solteirapt

Arquivos