Logo do repositório

Discrete Spectral Encryption of Single-Carrier Signals With Pseudo Random Dynamic Keys

dc.contributor.authorAbbade, Marcelo L. F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Welerson S.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Melissa O. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Ivan E. L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAldaya, Ivan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBonani, Luiz. H.
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Murilo A.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractPhysical layer security is a crucial step towards fully secure communications systems. The flexibility and ubiquity of digital signal processors in modern wireless and optical communication systems open up a clear path for the development of discrete-signals encryption techniques, which can be implemented relatively cheap. In this paper, we show the fundamental role of amplitude and phase encoding in the security and practical implementation of linear discrete signal cryptography (DSC). We focus on the spectral implementation of these encoding schemes and consider the equivalence between spectral amplitude encoding (SAE) and spectral scrambling (SS). Numerical simulation results show that 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (16-QAM) signals encrypted by SS and spectral phase encoding (SPE) can be recovered only if eavesdroppers know the exact position of sim ~95 % of the scrambled samples with a maximum phase error of pm ~7{circ } for all samples. The number of brute force attacks to break such encrypted signals far exceeds the one provided by the widely deployed data ciphering algorithm Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Physical layer results reveal that the bit error ratio (BER) associated with the encrypted signals is 0.50 regardless of the deployed signal format and DSC scheme. The BER vs. signal-to-noise ratio performance of the encrypted/ decrypted signal is the same as that of signals not encrypted. Finally, the paper proposes the adoption of pseudo-random dynamic keys (PRDKs) to promote encryption randomness, diffusion, and confusion to the encrypted signals. A new numerical methodology shows this strategy outperforms AES diffusion and confusion properties.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Engenharia São João da Boa Vista, São Carlos
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo (USP) Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, São Carlos
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do ABC Centro de Engenharia Modelagem e Ciências Sociais, Santo Andre
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Engenharia São João da Boa Vista, São Carlos
dc.format.extent4914-4929
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2024.3390995
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, v. 19, p. 4914-4929.
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TIFS.2024.3390995
dc.identifier.issn1556-6021
dc.identifier.issn1556-6013
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190821149
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/304700
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdigital signal processing
dc.subjectnetwork security
dc.subjectPhysical layer encryption
dc.titleDiscrete Spectral Encryption of Single-Carrier Signals With Pseudo Random Dynamic Keysen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication72ed3d55-d59c-4320-9eee-197fc0095136
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery72ed3d55-d59c-4320-9eee-197fc0095136
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2823-4725[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7969-3051[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8846-4202[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2312-7253[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, São João da Boa Vistapt

Arquivos