Logotipo do repositório

Which adiposity marker is most strongly associated with all‑cause and cause‑specific mortality? a prospective study of 158,699 Mexican adults

dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Weder Alves
dc.contributor.authorRezende, Leandro F. M.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Adilson
dc.contributor.authorde Maio Nascimento, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorNilson, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorChristofaro, Diego G. D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, Roberto Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Gerson
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)pt
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-28T17:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-01
dc.description.abstractBackgroundVarious methods have been used to assess adiposity and its associations with morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to examine the association of four adiposity markers with all‑cause and cause‑specific mortality, while evaluating the potential influence of reverse causation bias.MethodsThis prospective cohort study included 158,699 participants from the Mexico City Prospective Study. Cox regression models were performed to estimate the associations of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and waist-to-hip ratio with mortality risk. To minimize the influence of reverse causation, we excluded participants with prevalent diseases at baseline and conducted additional analyses excluding deaths occurring within the first 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up.ResultsOver a median of 15.5 years, 28,296 death were recorded. Waist circumference values above the recommended cutoff considered high were associated with higher all-cause mortality after the exclusion of the first 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.26–2.55, HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.23–2.62, and HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.14–2.70, respectively). Elevated waist-to-hip ratio was associated with increased all-cause mortality across the same exclusion periods (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.07–2.30, HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.05–2.49, and HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.01-2.52). High waist circumference was strongly associated with CVD mortality after exclusion of the first 2, 5, and 10 years (HR: 4.76; 95% CI: 1.70–11.82, HR: 4.75; 95% CI: 1.56–11.88, and HR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.42–12.90, respectively). Elevated waist-to-hip ratio similarly showed associations with CVD mortality (HR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.10–5.60, HR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.12–5.75, and HR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.03–7.32). Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and waist-hip ratio were not associated with respiratory and cancer mortality.ConclusionsWaist circumference was the adiposity marker most strongly associated with all-cause and CVD mortality, even after excluding the first 10 years of follow-up.
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Human Movement and Rehabilitation of Evangelical University of Goias, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationChronic Disease Epidemiology Research Center, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
dc.description.affiliationNúcleo de Investigación en Ciencias del Movimiento, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique, Chile
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Alimentação, Nutrição e Cultura, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasília, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia, Chile
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente (SP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniversidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Santiago, Chile
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente (SP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1190306242
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1190306242
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41366-025-01827-0
dc.identifier.issn0307-0565
dc.identifier.issn1476-5497
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7677-4710
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7469-1399
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9850-7771
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3577-3439
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2650-4878
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9917-9992
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8789-1744
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3177-6576
dc.identifier.pmid40596691
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/328751
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Obesity; n. 9; v. 49; p. 1792-1799
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleWhich adiposity marker is most strongly associated with all‑cause and cause‑specific mortality? a prospective study of 158,699 Mexican adults
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbbcf06b3-c5f9-4a27-ac03-b690202a3b4e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybbcf06b3-c5f9-4a27-ac03-b690202a3b4e
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Presidente Prudentept

Arquivos