Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Sediment toxicity assessment of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

dc.contributor.authorMaranho, L. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, I.
dc.contributor.authorSantelli, R.
dc.contributor.authorCordeiro, R. C.
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Gomes, A.
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, L. B.
dc.contributor.authorMorais, R. D.
dc.contributor.authorAbessa, D. M.S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUFF
dc.contributor.institutionUFC
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T22:37:14Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T22:37:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-01
dc.description.abstractGuanabara Bay (GB) comprises of estuarine and marine environments of high ecological and socio-economic relevance, together with port, industrial and urban areas. The anthropogenic activities produce environmental impacts, including the aquatic pollution. The sediment quality assessment is important to evaluate the effects of contamination, once sediments are a repository for most of the contaminants. In this study, the quality of sediments from GB was evaluated, in rainy and dry periods, throughout the employment of acute toxicity tests with the amphipod Tiburonella viscana, and chronic bioassays with embryos of the sea-urchin Lytechinus variegatus. In the dry period, acute toxicity was found in the sediments from stations 1, 2, 3 (NW) and 7 (near Guapimirim Environmental Protection Area). The bioassays with liquid phases showed effects, but were strongly influenced by the unionized ammonia levels, which were high in this period. In the rainy period, acute toxicity was found in sediments samples from stations 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12 and 15. Chronic toxicity could be clearly detected, as ammonia concentrations tended to be low in the most part of the samples. The results showed that the sediment toxicity is influenced by precipitation rates, which increase the input of contaminants to the Bay, and also allowed subdividing GB in three main zones: northwest (stations 1, 2, 3, 5), northeast (stations 6, 7, 8, 9) and centre-south (stations 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Results also showed that the quality of GB sediments is poor, and that toxicity tests could determine the combined effects of pollutants.en
dc.description.affiliationNEPEA UNESP, São Vicente, 11330-900
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Geoquímica UFF, Niteroi, 24020-007
dc.description.affiliationLABOMAR UFC, Fortaleza, 60165-081
dc.description.affiliationLab. de Biogeoquímica Marinha UFPR, Curitiba, 80030-070
dc.description.affiliationLab. Eco. Sed. DBM UFF, 100.644 Niterói RJ 24001-970
dc.description.affiliationUnespNEPEA UNESP, São Vicente, 11330-900
dc.format.extent851-855
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Coastal Research, n. SPEC. ISSUE 56, p. 851-855, 2009.
dc.identifier.issn0749-0208
dc.identifier.issn1551-5036
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955010654
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/226303
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Coastal Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBioassays
dc.subjectEcotoxicology
dc.subjectGuanabara Bay
dc.subjectSediment
dc.titleSediment toxicity assessment of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazilen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, São Vicentept
unesp.departmentCiências Biológicas - IBCLPpt

Arquivos