Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of two species-specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats

dc.contributor.authorCerejo, Sofia A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira-Neto, Francisco J. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarofalo, Natache A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Jéssica C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCeleita-Rodríguez, Nathalia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLagos-Carvajal, Angie P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:13:22Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:13:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the performance of 2 species-specific oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) monitors (petMAPclassic and petMAPgraphic) with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. Design: Prospective, experimental study. Setting: Veterinary teaching hospital. Animals: Eight adult cats (3.2–5.5 kg). Interventions: During isoflurane anesthesia, OBP cuffs were placed on the thoracic limb and on the base of the tail while invasive blood pressure (IBP) was recorded from a dorsal pedal artery. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations, with or without intravenous dopamine (n = 8), norepinephrine (n = 1), or phenylephrine (n = 1) were adjusted to change invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 40 to 100 mm Hg. Data were analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and 4-quadrant plots. Measurements and Main Results: Mean biases and limits of agreement (LOA: ± 1.96 SD) (mm Hg) recorded between the petMAPclassic (thoracic limb) and IBP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and MAP were 4.2 ± 28.5, −6.1 ± 13.2, and −1.9 ± 14.6, respectively; mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) recorded with the tail cuff were 7.2 ± 31.3 (SAP), −6.1 ± 11.6 (DAP), and −1.1 ± 11.7 (MAP). Mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) between petMAPgraphic (thoracic limb) and IBP were 7.7 ± 27.0 (SAP), −4.3 ± 11.5 (DAP), 0.2 ± 13.0 (MAP); values recorded with the tail cuff were 10.9 ± 29.6 (SAP), −4.4 ± 11.7 (DAP), and −0.1 ± 12.1 (MAP). Concordance rates after excluding arterial pressure changes ≤ 5 mm Hg was ≥ 93% for both devices. Conclusions: Although both OBP monitors provide unacceptable SAP estimations, MAP values derived from both monitors and DAP measured by the petMAPgraphic result in acceptable agreement with the reference method according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (mean bias ≤ 5 mm Hg with LOA ≤ ± 16 mm Hg). Both monitors provide acceptable trending ability for SAP, DAP, and MAP.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Anesthesiology Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/09837-8
dc.format.extent409-418
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.12623
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, v. 27, n. 4, p. 409-418, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/vec.12623
dc.identifier.issn1476-4431
dc.identifier.issn1479-3261
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85023637634
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174903
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,034
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,034
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanesthesia
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectfeline
dc.subjectnoninvasive pressure
dc.titleComparison of two species-specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized catsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos