Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Big, bad, and beautiful: phylogenetic relationships of the horned frogs (Anura: Ceratophryidae)

dc.contributor.authorFaivovich, Julian
dc.contributor.authorNicoli, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBlotto, Boris L.
dc.contributor.authorPereyra, Martin O.
dc.contributor.authorBaldo, Diego
dc.contributor.authorBarrionuevo, J. Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorFabrezi, Marissa
dc.contributor.authorWild, Erik R.
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Celio F. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad de Buenos Aires
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Nacional de Misiones
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-03T15:28:37Z
dc.date.available2015-11-03T15:28:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe horned frog family, Ceratophryidae, currently comprises three genera and 12 extant species, distributed from the Caribbean lowlands to the Pampean grasslands. Horned frogs are fossorial species that are remarkable in terms of their adult and larval morphology, karyotype, behavior, and other aspects of their biology. In this paper we present a molecular phylogenetic analysis with the goals of: (1) exploring the relationships among the species of Ceratophryidae; (2) studying the evolution of polyploidy; (3) studying the evolution of cocoon formation and larval development duration associated with surviving in semiarid environments; and (4) reviewing the ceratophryid fossil record that could be relevant as calibration points in molecular divergence estimations. The analysis included 11 of the 12 extant species and, when possible, multiple exemplars per species, as well as multiple outgroups. Sequence data were obtained on seven mitochondrial and six nuclear genes for up to 8200 bp per specimen. Our results indicate that the individual monophyly of Ceratophrys and Lepidobatrachus is well corroborated. The monotypic Chacophrys is recovered as the sister taxon of Lepidobatrachus, but with Jackknife frequency < 50%. Lepidobatrachus asper is the sister taxon of L. laevis + L. llanensis. Relationships within Ceratophrys are congruent with an earlier proposal, with a clade composed of the species possessing a dorsal bony shield (Ce. aurita, Ce. cranwelli, Ce. joazeirensis, and Ce. ornata), and another clade composed of Ce. stolzmanni, Ce. calcarata, and Ce. cornuta. Unlike earlier proposals, the octoploid species (Ce. aurita, Ce. joazeirensis, and Ce. ornata) are not monophyletic, as the diploid Ce. cranwelli, and Ce. ornata are sister taxa. This result implies an ambiguous optimization of ploidy levels, with either a single origin of octoploidy with a subsequent reversal to diploidy, or two independent origins of octoploidy being equally parsimonious; both alternatives are quite unusual from the perspective of chromosome evolution. Our results suggest that ceratophryids diversified in semiarid environments and three independent events resulted in three species subsequently occupying temperate or tropical humid areas. This early diversification in semiarid areas explains the retention of characteristics associated with these environments (like the production of a cocoon of dead skin during estivation, and possibly an accelerated larval period and development) in species present in humid areas. A revision of the fossil record of this family of frogs indicates that there are only two fossil remains that could serve as calibration points for molecular clock estimation, but a number of issues associated with them preclude their use.en
dc.description.affiliationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP 05508–090 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLaboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Universidad Nacional de Misiones), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, N3300LQF, Posadas, Argentina
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA, Centro Científico Tecnológico-Salta, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 9 de Julio 14, 4405, Rosario de Lerma, Salta, Argentina
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology and Museum of Natural History, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. Stevens Point, Wisconsin, 54022, USA.
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Avenida 24A 1515, CEP 13506–900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Avenida 24A 1515, CEP 13506–900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.sponsorshipANPCyT PICTs
dc.description.sponsorshipCONICET PIP
dc.description.sponsorshipUBACyT
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2010-1740
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2010-0616
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2011-1524
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2011-1895
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2012-2687
dc.description.sponsorshipIdANPCyT PICTs: 2013-404
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCONICET PIP: 1112008010 2422
dc.description.sponsorshipIdUBACyT: 2012-2015 20020110200213
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2012/10000-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/50741-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/20423-3
dc.format.extent207-227
dc.identifier.citationSouth American Journal Of Herpetology. Sao Paulo: Soc Brasileira Herpetologia, v. 9, n. 3, p. 207-227, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.2994/SAJH-D-14-00032.1
dc.identifier.issn1808-9798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/130018
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000347084200006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSoc Brasileira Herpetologia
dc.relation.ispartofSouth American Journal Of Herpetology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.596
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,483
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCeratophrysen
dc.subjectChacophrysen
dc.subjectDivergence time estimationen
dc.subjectFossil calibrationen
dc.subjectHyloidesen
dc.subjectKaryotype evolutionen
dc.subjectLepidobatrachusen
dc.subjectSemiarid environmentsen
dc.titleBig, bad, and beautiful: phylogenetic relationships of the horned frogs (Anura: Ceratophryidae)en
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderSoc Brasileira Herpetologia
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes0458077399058762[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2382-0872[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7044-5764[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentZoologia - IBpt

Arquivos