Logo do repositório

Chalcopyrite Dissolution: Challenges

dc.contributor.authorBevilaqua, Denise [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Ailton Guilherme Rissoni [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCrocco, Laíze Guimarães [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPeres, Riberto Nunes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Costa, Rachel Biancalana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBenedetti, Assis Vicente [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTuovinen, Olli H.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionOhio State University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:42:13Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractChalcopyrite is the main source of copper in the world, amounting to nearly 70% of the copper reserves. Nonetheless, chalcopyrite is highly recalcitrant to chemical and biological processing for copper extraction. Concentration by flotation and Cu recovery by pyrometallurgical techniques are still the main route for processing chalcopyrite concentrates, although they are unfeasible for copper extraction from low-grade ores that make up the most copper reserves. Acid bioleaching is a promising technique for extracting copper from low-grade copper ores, and the technology has been studied for decades, but there is still no commercial-scale bioleaching application for copper recovery from chalcopyrite concentrates. Bioleaching is practiced with low-grade chalcopyrite ores in heap leaching processes with ores of multiple sulfide minerals. Research in this area has probed electrochemical reactions, biological activities, and interactions with microbes and mineral surfaces to integrate operational models for chalcopyrite bioleaching. The purpose of this chapter is to review the evolution in the understanding of the chemical leaching and bioleaching of chalcopyrite in the last 20 years, and the progress achieved so far.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Analytical Physical-Chemical and Inorganic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Avenue
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Analytical Physical-Chemical and Inorganic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.format.extent23-39
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43625-3_2
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation, v. Part F2284, p. 23-39.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-43625-3_2
dc.identifier.issn2522-8722
dc.identifier.issn2522-8714
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197419066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299368
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Science, Technology and Innovation
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChalcopyrite bioleaching
dc.subjectElectrochemical techniques
dc.subjectGalvanic interactions
dc.subjectPolarization
dc.subjectRedox potential control
dc.titleChalcopyrite Dissolution: Challengesen
dc.typeCapítulo de livropt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbc74a1ce-4c4c-4dad-8378-83962d76c4fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybc74a1ce-4c4c-4dad-8378-83962d76c4fd
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Química, Araraquarapt

Arquivos