Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
CAN THE CRITICAL POWER MODEL EXPLAIN THE INCREASED PEAK VELOCITY/POWER DURING INCREMENTAL TEST AFTER CONCURRENT STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE TRAINING?

dc.contributor.authorDenadai, Benedito S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Camila C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:40:00Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:40:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.description.abstractDenadai, BS and Greco, CC. Can the critical power model explain the increased peak velocity/power during incremental test after concurrent strength and endurance training? J Strength Cond Res 31(8): 2319-2323, 2017-The highest exercise intensity that can be maintained at the end of a ramp or step incremental test (i.e., velocity or work rate at Vo(2)max - Vpeak/Wpeak) can be used for endurance performance prediction and individualization of aerobic training. The interindividual variability in Vpeak/Wpeak has been attributed to exercise economy, anaerobic capacity, and neuromuscular capability, alongside the major determinant of aerobic capacity. Interestingly, findings after concurrent strength and endurance training performed by endurance athletes have challenged the actual contribution of these variables. The critical power model usually derived from the performance of constant-work rate exercise can also explain tolerance to a ramp incremental exercise so that, Vpeak/Wpeak can be predicted accurately. However, there is not yet discussion of possible concomitant improvements in the parameters of the critical power model and Vpeak/Wpeak after concurrent training and whether they can be associated with and therefore depend on different neuromuscular adaptations. Therefore, this brief review presents some evidence that the critical power model could explain the improvement of Vpeak/Wpeak and should be used to monitor aerobic performance enhancement after different concurrent strength-and endurance-training designs.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Human Performance Lab, Rio Claro, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Human Performance Lab, Rio Claro, Brazil
dc.format.extent2319-2323
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001858
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Strength And Conditioning Research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 31, n. 8, p. 2319-2323, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000001858
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/163082
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000406614200036
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Strength And Conditioning Research
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,366
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectmaximal oxygen uptake
dc.subjectexercise economy
dc.subjectathlete
dc.subjectanaerobic capacity
dc.subjectexercise tolerance
dc.titleCAN THE CRITICAL POWER MODEL EXPLAIN THE INCREASED PEAK VELOCITY/POWER DURING INCREMENTAL TEST AFTER CONCURRENT STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE TRAINING?en
dc.typeResenha
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes1907479250833033[1]
unesp.author.lattes7416129894680689[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0775-1889[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7611-9759[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentEducação Física - IBpt

Arquivos