Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Factors affecting sanitation coverage in three income levels and potential toward achieving SDG 6.2

dc.contributor.authorBankole, Abayomi Oluwatobiloba [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJames, Abraham Olamilekan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOdjegba, Enovwo Erere
dc.contributor.authorBankole, Afolashade Racheal [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorEmmanuel, Babajide I. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFiore, Fabiana A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPu, Jaan H.
dc.contributor.authorMoruzzi, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Agriculture
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:47:05Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:47:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-01
dc.description.abstractAn equitable sanitation coverage promotes sustainability, economic prosperity, and public health protection. This study examined factors affecting sanitation coverage and the potential of selected countries across three income levels (Low-Income, Lower-Middle, and Upper-Middle Income Countries) to meet Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 by developing a Sanitation Coverage Index (SCI). Nine developing countries were selected based on the following sets of criteria: income level, population, and geographical region. Twenty years (2000-2020) of sanitation coverage data were extracted from the JMP database and visualized. The SCI was developed using the service level criteria and examined the local drivers of poor sanitation coverage. Findings show that all countries studied made good progress and have commendable current status, except Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Nigeria. Nigeria has the highest open defecation coverage and may not meet the 2030 target. The SCI result shows that Turkey, Ukraine, and China have excellent coverage (scoring: 44, 43, and 40). Brazil, Bangladesh, and DPR Korea have satisfactory performances (36, 31, and 31), while Nigeria, Rwanda, and Ethiopia recorded unsatisfactory progress (28, 27, and 16). The strongest factors influencing poor coverage include population, high socioeconomic inequalities, and socio-political challenges. Therefore, the institutionalization of minimum acceptable standards, adequate sensitization, and funding could improve sanitation coverage in the countries assessed.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Bauru Campus
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Water Resources Management and Agrometeorology Federal University of Agriculture
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Environmental Management and Toxicology Federal University of Agriculture
dc.description.affiliationDepartmento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Sao Jose dos Campos (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Engineering and Informatics University of Bradford
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Bauru Campus
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartmento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Sao Jose dos Campos (UNESP)
dc.format.extent146-176
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.181
dc.identifier.citationWater Policy, v. 25, n. 2, p. 146-176, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.2166/wp.2023.181
dc.identifier.issn1996-9759
dc.identifier.issn1366-7017
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150695036
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248552
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWater Policy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectSanitation coverage
dc.subjectSocio-political
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.titleFactors affecting sanitation coverage in three income levels and potential toward achieving SDG 6.2en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5991-0506 0000-0002-5991-0506[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7878-7067 0000-0001-7878-7067[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3402-4708[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9367-8926 0000-0001-9367-8926[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8799-9395 0000-0001-8799-9395[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2430-8240[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3944-8801[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1573-3747 0000-0002-1573-3747[8]
unesp.departmentEngenharia Civil e Ambiental - FEBpt

Arquivos