Logotipo do repositório

Slow Freezing vs. Vitrification of Testicular Tissue in Nontraditional Animal Models

dc.contributor.authorSandoval, Eluzai Dinai Pinto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLee, Pei-Chih
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, José Mauricio Barbanti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorComizzoli, Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-05T13:09:12Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-28
dc.description.abstract<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Optimal cryopreservation of testicular tissue is essential for species research and conservation, enabling long-term storage of genetic resources through vitrification or slow freezing. Comparing responses from different taxonomic groups to these techniques is crucial for refining protocols and improving cryopreservation outcomes. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study evaluated the effects of cryopreservation on cell viability, morphology, mitochondrial activity, and proliferative potential to optimize testicular tissue preservation strategies for wildlife conservation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We assessed testicular tissue from Felidae and Cervidae, including domestic cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) and Neotropical deer species, white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>), Brazilian red brocket deer (<i>Mazama nana</i>), and gray brocket deer (<i>Subulo gouazoubira</i>). Experimental groups included control (no cryopreservation), slow freezing using Mr. Frosty or progressive temperature decrease, and conventional vitrification. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All methods preserved live cells and normal tissue morphology; however, compared with fresh tissue, cryopreservation significantly reduced tissue viability, mitochondrial membrane potential, and the proportion of intact seminiferous tubules. Species-specific differences emerged, with vitrification being most effective for domestic cats, while slow freezing yielded better results for Neotropical deer. Despite lower viability scores, vitrification could still be an acceptable option for cervids due to its rapid processing and minimal equipment requirements. In addition, post-cryopreservation tissue culture increased cell abnormalities, highlighting the need to optimize culture conditions for different species. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This comparative study advances reproductive tissue preservation techniques and emphasizes the importance of tailored cryopreservation as well as <i>in vitro</i> culture protocols for diverse taxonomic groups.
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Sciences, Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationSmithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Sciences, Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1194354467
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1194354467
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/19475535251391026
dc.identifier.issn1947-5535
dc.identifier.issn1947-5543
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6849-7373
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7121-5047
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7805-0265
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3079-9063
dc.identifier.pmid41151088
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/323208
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.ispartofBiopreservation and Biobanking
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleSlow Freezing vs. Vitrification of Testicular Tissue in Nontraditional Animal Models
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos