Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor

dc.contributor.authorPini, Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
dc.contributor.authorDe-Marchi, Luciana Manzotti
dc.contributor.authorGribel, Bruno Frazão
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Adilson Luiz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFurquim, Laurindo Zanco
dc.contributor.authorPascotto, Renata Corrêa
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Michigan
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T18:58:07Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T18:58:07Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the width/length ratio and the gingival zenith (GZ), by means of dental casts and digital caliper, in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors after treatment. Methods: The sample was composed of 52 subjects divided into 3 groups: BRG (n = 18), patients with bilateral agenesis treated with tooth re-contouring; BIG (n = 10) patients with agenesis treated with implants and CG (n = 24), control group. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, t test and ANOVA tests (p < 0. 05). Results: For the width/length ratio of the lateral incisors, BIG presented the lowest mean values (0. 72 right and left), when compared with other groups. However, comparison between groups presented statistically significant differences for the right lateral incisor (BIG x CG) and for the canine (BRG x CG). GZ data evaluation showed the greatest difference for BRG (0. 5 right and 0. 48 left). BIG (0. 95 right and 0. 98 left) and CG (0. 98 right and 0. 8 left) presented more similar values, nevertheless, without statistical difference (p > 0. 05). GZ data for the right and left sides of the smile were not considered statistically different. Conclusion: Although no statistical difference was found in the comparison between the groups, analysis of the descriptive values showed that group BIG showed the greatest difference in values with regard to width/length ratio. Regarding gingival zenith, BRG showed the greatest difference. © 2012 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.en
dc.description.affiliationFOP/UNICAMP
dc.description.affiliationUEM Department of Dentistry at CESUMAR
dc.description.affiliationPUC/MG University of Michigan
dc.description.affiliationFOB/USP UNESP UEM, AMO and CESUMAR
dc.description.affiliationFOB/USP UEM, AMO and CESUMAR
dc.description.affiliationUSP UEM
dc.description.affiliationUnespFOB/USP UNESP UEM, AMO and CESUMAR
dc.format.extent87-93
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512012000500013
dc.identifier.citationDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 17, n. 5, p. 87-93, 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S2176-94512012000500013
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451
dc.identifier.issn2177-6709
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871447522
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219863
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDental Press Journal of Orthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental agenesis
dc.subjectGingival zenith
dc.subjectWidth/length ratio
dc.titleAnalysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisoren
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções