Logo do repositório
 

Effect of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on hydrocarbon degradation and detoxification of diesel-contaminated soil: a microcosm study

dc.contributor.authorGiovanella, Patricia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Lídia de Azevedo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKita, Daniela Mayumi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Valéria Maia
dc.contributor.authorSette, Lara Durães [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:16:16Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:16:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractSoil contamination with diesel oil is quite common during processes of transport and storage. Bioremediation is considered a safe, economical, and environmentally friendly approach for contaminated soil treatment. In this context, studies using hydrocarbon bioremediation have focused on total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis to assess process effectiveness, while ecotoxicity has been neglected. Thus, this study aimed to select a microbial consortium capable of detoxifying diesel oil and apply this consortium to the bioremediation of soil contaminated with this environmental pollutant through different bioremediation approaches. Gas chromatography (GC-FID) was used to analyze diesel oil degradation, while ecotoxicological bioassays with the bioindicators Artemia sp., Aliivibrio fischeri (Microtox), and Cucumis sativus were used to assess detoxification. After 90 days of bioremediation, we found that the biostimulation and biostimulation/bioaugmentation approaches showed higher rates of diesel oil degradation in relation to natural attenuation (41.9 and 26.7%, respectively). Phytotoxicity increased in the biostimulation and biostimulation/bioaugmentation treatments during the degradation process, whereas in the Microtox test, the toxicity was the same in these treatments as that in the natural attenuation treatment. In both the phytotoxicity and Microtox tests, bioaugmentation treatment showed lower toxicity. However, compared with natural attenuation, this approach did not show satisfactory hydrocarbon degradation. Based on the microcosm experiments results, we conclude that a broader analysis of the success of bioremediation requires the performance of toxicity bioassays.en
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Biosciences Department of General and Applied Biology Laboratory of Environmental and Industrial Mycology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationResearch Center for Chemistry Biology and Agriculture Microbial Resources Division State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Biosciences Department of General and Applied Biology Laboratory of Environmental and Industrial Mycology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12275-021-0395-2
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Microbiology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12275-021-0395-2
dc.identifier.issn1976-3794
dc.identifier.issn1225-8873
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105964436
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208686
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Microbiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbacteria
dc.subjectbiostimulation
dc.subjectdetoxification
dc.subjectfungi
dc.subjecthydrocarbon degradation
dc.titleEffect of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on hydrocarbon degradation and detoxification of diesel-contaminated soil: a microcosm studyen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentBioquímica e Microbiologia - IBpt

Arquivos