Logotipo do repositório

Evaluation of mechanical properties of CAD-CAM composite resins for milled versus 3D printed definitive restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Gabriel Nunes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Limírio, João Pedro Justino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Jéssica Marcela de Luna [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo
dc.contributor.authorPesqueira, Aldiéris Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-14T20:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-11
dc.description.abstractSTATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Three-dimensionally (3D) printed composite resin materials for definitive restorations have recently been introduced but doubts still exist regarding their mechanical properties. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) composite resins used in the fabrication of definitive restorations using 3D printing and milling methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/gps2f/) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: "Do the CAD-CAM composite resins for definitive restorations used in the 3D printing method have mechanical properties similar to those used in the milling method?" A literature search was carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Lilacs databases until November 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoBDEMAT tool. The meta-analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5.4 program (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 6 in vitro studies published until November 2024 were included after the search, and a total of 440 specimens were evaluated. Milled composite resins demonstrated higher values for flexural strength in the 3-point bend test (P<.001; SMD: -1.76; 95% CI: -2.51 to -1.02), microhardness (P<.001; SMD: -2.32; 95% CI: -2.66 to -2.05), and elastic modulus (P<.001; SMD: -4.28; 95% CI: -6.51 to -2.05). In the biaxial flexural strength test, no significant differences were observed (P=.29; SMD: -0.74; 95% CI: -2.11 to -0.62). All meta-analyses exhibited high heterogeneity (I²>84%), except for microhardness (I²=5%). CONCLUSIONS: When the flexural strength, elastic modulus, and Vickers microhardness for CAD-CAM composite resins (3D printed and milled) were evaluated, the milled resins exhibited better mechanical properties.
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: joao.limirio@hotmail.com.
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationAdjunct Professor, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF/GV), Governador Valadares, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationAssociate Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationFull Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: joao.limirio@hotmail.com.
dc.description.affiliationUnespAssistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespAssociate Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespFull Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1189653150
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1189653150
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.05.024
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2621-6200
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8273-489X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3020-5253
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0670-5004
dc.identifier.pmid40506304
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/321816
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleEvaluation of mechanical properties of CAD-CAM composite resins for milled versus 3D printed definitive restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt

Arquivos