Logo do repositório

Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys

dc.contributor.authorBonhin, Eduardo Pires [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMüzel, Sarah David [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros
dc.contributor.authorGuidi, Erick Siqueira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Fernando de Azevedo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionTechnical Course in Electromechanics at Etec – Professor Alfredo de Barros Santos – CEETEPS
dc.contributor.institutionMechanical Engineering Department of Technological University of Peru
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-01
dc.description.abstractThe utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá
dc.description.affiliationTechnical Course in Electromechanics at Etec – Professor Alfredo de Barros Santos – CEETEPS, Guaratinguetá
dc.description.affiliationMechanical Engineering Department of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá
dc.description.affiliationMechanical Engineering Department of Technological University of Peru
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá
dc.description.affiliationUnespMechanical Engineering Department of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá
dc.format.extent918-924
dc.identifier.citationIAENG International Journal of Computer Science, v. 51, n. 7, p. 918-924, 2024.
dc.identifier.issn1819-9224
dc.identifier.issn1819-656X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85198952516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298953
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIAENG International Journal of Computer Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCarbon Fibers
dc.subjectFinite Element
dc.subjectMaterials
dc.subjectPolyphenylene Sulfide Composite
dc.titleEvaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansysen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4071986-4355-47c3-a5a3-bd4d1a966e4f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya4071986-4355-47c3-a5a3-bd4d1a966e4f
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia e Ciências, Guaratinguetápt

Arquivos