Logo do repositório

<i>Public policies and cartography of the traditional communities territory's on the coast of São Paulo and southern Rio de Janeiro</i>

dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Leonardo Esteves de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSansolo, Davis Gruber [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCioffi, Giovana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Cadiz
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractOfficial maps play a relevant role as representations of reality with specific objectives and, generally, favor hegemonic social actors. In contrast, researchers and communities have mapped elements of community interests, supporting the fight for their socio-territorial rights, as occurs in territories of traditional communities on the coast of S & atilde;o Paulo and south of Rio de Janeiro. This paper compares processes of spatial representation of these communities in nine official instruments of public territorial management and in two databases of partners of traditional communities in order to analyze the relationship between the representation of these communities and the incidence of public policy. Analysis parameters were defined to identify convergences and divergences between the materials: presence and absence of information; level of detail; way of characterizing communities. In official mappings, these communities are made invisible. Map maded by Laplan/Unesp shows 72 communities, against 23 of maps linked to public policies of the state of S & atilde;o Paulo, for the same territory. Map of Angra dos Reis and Paraty/RJ, prepared by Fiocruz/FCT, brings 82 communities, while official maps of the state of RJ present 42. Official maps highlight conservation units and urban and tourism activities and do not prioritize activities of traditional communities, subordinating traditional uses to the preservation of nature and the reproduction of capital. In practice, this leads to, the prohibition of activities that are essential for social reproduction, the criminalization of these communities and their disregard in the elaboration of public policies. Environmental policies and development vectors associated with the reproduction of capital are defined without considering the rights of these communities, which leads to sociocultural mischaracterization and the expulsion of community members from their territories, generating a worsening the socio-environmental situation.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationFundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Rio De Janeiro UFRJ, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Cadiz, Cadiz, Andaluzia, Spain
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent463-463
dc.identifier.citationDesenvolvimento E Meio Ambiente. Parana: Univ Federal Parana, Editora, v. 63, p. 463-463, 2024.
dc.identifier.issn1518-952X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307493
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001257797000002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniv Federal Parana, Editora
dc.relation.ispartofDesenvolvimento E Meio Ambiente
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecttraditional communities
dc.subjectterritorial conflicts
dc.subjectcartographic representations
dc.subjectpublic policy
dc.subjectcoast
dc.title<i>Public policies and cartography of the traditional communities territory's on the coast of São Paulo and southern Rio de Janeiro</i>en
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Federal Parana, Editora
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções