Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Life cycle assessment of a hot-pressing machine to manufacture particleboards: hotspots, environmental indicators, and solutions

dc.contributor.authorLopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido
dc.contributor.authorFirmino, Alessandro Silveira
dc.contributor.authorFerro, Fabiane Salles
dc.contributor.authorChristoforo, Andre Luis
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Florence Rezende [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocco Lahr, Francisco Antonio
dc.contributor.authorKellens, Karel
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionMidwestern State Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionKatholieke Univ Leuven
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T17:35:07Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T17:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose Green manufacturing (GM) is the environmental benign manufacturing of products with a minimal negative impact on the natural environment. Research studies on GM have increased in the last years with attention to the application of life cycle assessment (LCA). However, the manufacturing industry still faces some barriers and challenges that hinder a proper practical integration of GM using LCA. Accordingly, this paper performs an LCA-based GM case study of a wood-based industry that produces particleboards to investigate environmental hotspots and suggests GM indicators and solutions for a hot-pressing machine tool. Methods A case study of a wood-based industry that produces particleboards in Brazil was designed. A LCA-based GM framework was developed and applied according to its three phases: pre-assessment, environmental assessment and monitoring, and post-assessment. Each phase is composed of specific stages and each stage has its own activities and goals. To quantify the environmental life cycle impacts, the ILCD midpoint method with 13 impact categories was selected. Based on these environmental impacts, a set of indicators and solutions was designed to improve the product life cycle impacts through a greener manufacturing process of particleboards. A cradle-to-grave approach was used to model the particleboard life cycle and the manufacturing phase was modeled based on the unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) methodology. Results and discussion The particleboard manufacture was designed into five unit processes and results of the pre-assessment showed that the hot-pressing unit was the most relevant process because of its direct and indirect impacts mainly to human toxicity cancer effects, global warming, and photochemical ozone formation. During the environmental assessment and monitoring phase, the hot-pressing machine was then investigated based on the main contributors to the caused environmental impacts, i.e., electricity consumption and air emissions of free formaldehyde, as well as in terms of its most relevant process parameters: pressure (P) and temperature (T). Opportunities to reduce up to 21% upstream impacts and up to 41% downstream impacts were identified from making simple changes to the hot-pressing parameters. Further investigation in the post-assessment revealed that environmental impacts can be estimated based on the appliedPandTvalues and GM indicators were suggested. Conclusions The proposed GM framework can be used in other case studies to integrate GM + LCA in practice. Results of the case study application showed that the hot-pressing machine was a hotspot into the cradle-to-grave life cycle impacts of particleboards and the proposed GM indicators can be used to predict life cycle impacts at manufacturing level.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Sci & Technol Management, Res Grp Sustainabil Engn, Dept Prod Engn, Rodovia Joao Leme Santos,Km 110,SP 264, BR-13565905 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationMidwestern State Univ, Dept Forest Engn, PR 153,Km 7 S-N, BR-84500000 Irati, PR, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Civil Engn, Rodovia Washington Luis,Km 235,SP 310, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Tres Marco Ave 511, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Engn Sao Carlos, Dept Struct Engn, Av Trabalhador Sao Carlene, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationKatholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, Campus Diepenbeek,Wetenschapspk 27, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Tres Marco Ave 511, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent1059-1077
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01755-3
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 25, n. 6, p. 1059-1077, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11367-020-01755-3
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/195454
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000541856200008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectGreen manufacturing of particleboards
dc.subjectGreen manufacturing indicators
dc.subjectAssessment criteria and indicators
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment of manufacturing
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of a hot-pressing machine to manufacture particleboards: hotspots, environmental indicators, and solutionsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dcterms.rightsHolderSpringer
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Sorocabapt

Arquivos