Logo do repositório

Agreement of Single-Frequency Electrical Bioimpedance in the Evaluation of Fat Free Mass and Fat Mass in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

dc.contributor.authorCarmo Reis, Nayrana Soares do [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDelatim Vaninni, Francieli Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCanedo Silva, Maryanne Zilli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rogerio Carvalho de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorReis, Fabricio Moreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fabiana Lourenco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Luis Cuadrado [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T15:07:32Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T15:07:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-31
dc.description.abstractBackground: Protein-energy wasting is related to impairment of quality of life and lower survival of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The evaluation of body composition, especially fat free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM), is important for the prediction of outcomes in these individuals. The aim of this study was to compare the FFM and FM measurements obtained by single-frequency bioimpedance (SF-BIA) and by a multiple frequency bioimpedance (MF-BIA) device, using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving adult patients undergoing regular PD, in which we performed SF-BIA, MF-BIA, and DXA at the same visit. To compare the bioimpedance values with DXA, we used: Person correlation (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman concordance analysis. Results: The sample consisted of 50 patients in the PD, with mean age of 55.1 +/- 16.3 years. Both bioimpedance methods showed a strong correlation (r > 0.7) and excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.75) compared to DXA. According to the Bland-Altman diagram, SF-BIA showed agreement in body compartment measurements, with no proportionality bias (p > 0.05), without systematic bias for FFM (-0.5 +/- 4.9, 95% CI -1.8 to 0.9, p = 0.506), and for FM (0.3 +/- 4.6, p = 0.543). MF-BIA did not present a proportionality bias for the FFM, but it underestimated this body compartment by 2.5 +/- 5.4 kg (p = 0.002). In addition, MF-BIA presented proportionality bias for FM. Conclusion: SF-BIA was a more accurate assessing method than MBIA for FFM and FM measurements in PD patients. Because it is a low-cost, non-evaluator-dependent measurement and has less systematic bias, it can also be recommended for fat mass and free-fat mass evaluation in PD patients.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Internal Med Dept, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Internal Med Dept, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent9
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.686513
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers In Nutrition. Lausanne: Frontiers Media Sa, v. 8, 9 p., 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnut.2021.686513
dc.identifier.issn2296-861X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/210403
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000661033000001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers In Nutrition
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectnutrition
dc.subjectdialysis
dc.subjectperitoneal dialysis
dc.subjectelectrical bioimpedance
dc.subjectdual energy x-ray absorbsiometry
dc.titleAgreement of Single-Frequency Electrical Bioimpedance in the Evaluation of Fat Free Mass and Fat Mass in Peritoneal Dialysis Patientsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderFrontiers Media Sa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublicatione31a9b63-072c-4e5b-9812-9c0b621b4848
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye31a9b63-072c-4e5b-9812-9c0b621b4848
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica Médica - FMBpt

Arquivos