Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Productive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattle

dc.contributor.authorMogollón-García, Henry David [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNieto-Sierra, David Felipe
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Rincón, Edwin
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionCorporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:28:59Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. During decades, milk production in the department of Nariño has depended on the Holstein breed. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate a model of milk production that allows to decrease production costs and in turn improves the compositional quality of the milk. Objective. This study aimed was to compare the monthly milk production, days in lactation (DIM), and milk production per third of lactation of the F1 crossing of the Kiwi Cross (KC) and Holstein (HO) breeds, under grazing conditions in the high tropics of the Nariño department, Colombia. Materials and methods. Monthly milk production in HO cows (n=30) and F1 (n=40) was measured by adjusting the DIM, milk production was also obtained by third of lactation, fat, protein, and total solids. Results. Maximum production was higher for HO cows compared to KC (25.8±0.53 vs. 23.2±0.53 l day-1) (p<0.05). Production per third of lactation was higher (p<0.05) in the first third compared to the second and third periods for both breeds study (HO: 13.6±0.56 vs.11.3±0.5723 and 9.9±0.47 l day-1, and KC: 12.8±0.4505 vs. 10.6±0.66 and 9.5±1.69 l day-1). Fat was higher (p<0.05) in Kiwi Cross F1 crosses than in Holstein, at weeks one, three, and five (4±0.07, 4±0.07, 4±0.07 vs. 3.6±0.12, 3.6±0.11, 3.7±0.09 %, respectively); likewise, protein in weeks one and four was higher in the KC group compared to HO (3.3±0.04 vs. 3.1±0.05 %; p<0.05). Total solids were 13.3±0.17 vs. 12.5±0.23 % (p<0.05) for F1 and HO cows, respectively at weeks two and five. Conclusion. F1 and Holstein (HO) milk production was similar; however, KC improved the performance in the compositional milk quality, increasing the percentages of fat, protein, and total solids.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Departament of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Rua Prof. Dr. Walter Maurício Correa s/n
dc.description.affiliationCorporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA), Km 5 vía Pasto - Obonuco
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Departament of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Rua Prof. Dr. Walter Maurício Correa s/n
dc.format.extent329-339
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15517/am.v31i2.38541
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy Mesoamerican, v. 31, n. 2, p. 329-339, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.15517/am.v31i2.38541
dc.identifier.issn2215-3608
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090542025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/228845
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy Mesoamerican
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal performance
dc.subjectDairy cattle
dc.subjectLactation
dc.subjectMilk yield
dc.titleProductive performance of Holstein and the crossbreding Kiwi Cross x Holstein cattleen
dc.titleRendimiento productivo de Ganado Holstein y el cruzamiento Kiwi Cross x Holsteines
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9ca5a87b-0c83-43fa-b290-6f8a4202bf99
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9ca5a87b-0c83-43fa-b290-6f8a4202bf99
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0820-5847[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4808-1201[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9841-8242[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentReprodução Animal e Radiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos