Logo do repositório

Frailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a survey

dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Paula Schmidt [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Melo, Ruth Caldeira
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFrost, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorGavin, James P.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Katie
dc.contributor.authorBoas, Paulo José Fortes Villas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMinicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAprahamian, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorWachholz, Patrick Alexander [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHinslif-Smith, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Adam Lee
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity College London
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Southampton
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Nottingham
dc.contributor.institutionFaculty of Medicine of Jundiaí
dc.contributor.institutionDe Montfort University
dc.contributor.institutionNIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East Midlands (ARC-EM)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: National and international guidelines on frailty assessment and management recommend frailty screening in older people. This study aimed to determine how Brazilian healthcare professionals (HCPs) identify and manage frailty in practice. Methods: An anonymous online survey on the assessment and management of frailty was circulated virtually through HCPs across Brazil. Results: Most of the respondants used non-specific criteria such as gait speed (45%), handgrip strength (37.6%), and comprehensive geriatric assessment (33.2%). The use of frailty-specific criteria was lower than 50%. The most frequently used criteria were the Frailty Index (19.1%), Frailty Phenotype (13.2%), and FRAIL (12.5%). Only 43.5% felt confident, and 40% had a plan to manage frailty. In the multivariate-adjusted models, training was the most crucial factor associated with assessing frailty, confidence, and having a management plan (p < 0.001 for all). Those with fewer years of experience were more likely to evaluate frailty (p = 0.009). Being a doctor increased the chance of using a specific tool; the opposite was true for dietitians (p = 0.03). Those who assisted more older people had a higher likelihood of having a plan (p = 0.011). Conclusion: Frailty assessment was heterogeneous among healthcare professions groups, predominantly using non-specific criteria. Training contributed to frailty assessment, use of specific criteria, confidence, and having a management plan. This data informs the need for standardized screening criteria and management plans for frailty, in association with increasing training at the national level for all the HCPs who assist older people.en
dc.description.affiliationBotucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp), District of Rubião Junior, no number, SP
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Arts Sciences and Humanities University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health University College London
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences University of Southampton
dc.description.affiliationAcademic Unit of Injury Recovery and Inflammation Sciences (IRIS) University of Nottingham
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Medicine of Jundiaí
dc.description.affiliationLeicester School of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University
dc.description.affiliationNIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East Midlands (ARC-EM)
dc.description.affiliationUnespBotucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp), District of Rubião Junior, no number, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: (Finance Code 001)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: CAPES-PRINT-UNESP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05020-2
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics, v. 24, n. 1, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-024-05020-2
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195009594
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301572
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Geriatrics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectFrailty
dc.subjectFrailty criteria
dc.subjectHealthcare professionals
dc.subjectOlder people
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.titleFrailty identification and management among Brazilian healthcare professionals: a surveyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos