Logo do repositório

Efeitos do etil‐2‐cianoacrilato e do butil‐2‐cianoacrilato no processo de consolidação óssea em ratos. Estudo experimental controlado

dc.contributor.authorPalacio, Evandro Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gilberto José Cação [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilvares, Paulo Roberto de Almeida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDi Stasi, Gabriel Guimarães
dc.contributor.authorStaut, Caio de Andrade
dc.contributor.authorSardenberg, Trajano [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Medicina de Marília
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:12:43Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:12:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective Synthetic adhesives are used by various medical specialties, especially in surgery; however, studies reporting their use in orthopedic practice are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the results in using ethyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate or butyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate in the treatment of fractures in rats. Methods This was an experimental prospective controlled study in 90 rats, with humerus, femur, and tibia fractures, treated with ethyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate (SB group; n = 45) or butyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate (HA group; n = 45). Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses were performed at three different moments (60, 120, and 180 days); besides a clinical study performed weekly by measurement of the animals body mass. Results No differences were observed regarding body mass (p = 0.07). In both groups, there were no significant differences regarding maximum load (p = 0.6), yield point strength (p = 0.6), and stiffness coefficient (p = 0.4) of the femurs. The same was observed in tibias for maximum load (p = 0.4), yield point strength (p = 0.7), and stiffness coefficient (p = 0.6). The humerus from both groups had similar bone callus area (p = 0.66). In both groups, there were no statistical differences related to inflammatory cells (p = 0.4), osteoblasts (p = 0.2), and osteoclasts (p = 0.2). Conclusion Ethyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate was more effective than butyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate in the treatment of fractures in rats.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina de Marília
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent53-59
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2016.12.007
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia, v. 53, n. 1, p. 53-59, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rbo.2016.12.007
dc.identifier.issn1982-4378
dc.identifier.issn0102-3616
dc.identifier.lattes9733983545921495
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020689226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174755
dc.language.isoeng
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,319
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCyanoacrylates
dc.subjectFracture healing
dc.subjectFractures, bones
dc.subjectTissue adhesives
dc.titleEfeitos do etil‐2‐cianoacrilato e do butil‐2‐cianoacrilato no processo de consolidação óssea em ratos. Estudo experimental controladopt
dc.title.alternativeThe effects of ethyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate and butyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate in the process of bone healing in rats. A controlled experimental studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication6e0a9036-4bd6-43e5-9556-6c2945320ec1
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6e0a9036-4bd6-43e5-9556-6c2945320ec1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.lattes9733983545921495[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Ortopedia - FMBpt

Arquivos