Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
In silico Evaluation of Cucurbit[6]uril as a Potential Detector for Cocaine and Its Adulterants Lidocaine, Caffeine, and Procaine

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Caio H. P.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez-Gonzalez, Jorge E. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPedrina, Natalia J.
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Vitor B. P.
dc.contributor.authorBruni, Aline T.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionInst Nacl Ciencia & Tecnol Forense INCT Forense
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:39:18Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-01
dc.description.abstractIllicit drugs and their trafficking require worldwide efforts in investigation, detection, and control. Colorimetric tests are often applied to identify drugs. Cocaine has some well-known adulterants that can provide a false positive response. Cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) has been suggested as a potential detector for cocaine and other illicit drugs. This work uses in silico methods to evaluate the use of CB[6] to detect cocaine and these interfering substances. More specifically, this work analyzes different possibilities of CB[6] complexation with cocaine, lidocaine, caffeine, and procaine and compares the results achieved for cocaine and its adulterants. Different methodologies were employed: quantum chemistry was investigated through DFT B3LYP/TZVP (density functional theory-Becke, three-parameter, Lee-Yang-Parr with triple zeta valence plus polarization basis set) and the semi-empirical methods Austin model 1 (AM1), parametric methods 3, 6, and 7 (PM3, PM6, PM7), and Recife model 1 (RM1). We used these methodologies intending to compare the reasonability and reproducibility of the results in the gas phase condition. Solvent influence was studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Results showed that CB[6] does not bind to these substances, as judged from the positive values of binding free energy obtained with all methods. DFT and MD were the most reliable methods whereas semiempirical ones were not reproductible in describing these systems. Results also showed that interactions are not specific, so CB[6] does not provide a good response for cocaine detection.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Filosofia Ciencias & Letras Ribeirao Preto, Dept Quim, Ave Bandeirantes 3900, BR-14040901 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationInst Nacl Ciencia & Tecnol Forense INCT Forense, Ave Bandeirantes 3900, BR-14040901 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias Letras & Ciencias Exatas, Dept Fis, Rua Cristovao Colombo 2265, BR-15054000 Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias Letras & Ciencias Exatas, Dept Fis, Rua Cristovao Colombo 2265, BR-15054000 Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 465450/2014-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/19766-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/24587-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.format.extent800-810
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20200231
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of The Brazilian Chemical Society. Sao Paulo: Soc Brasileira Quimica, v. 32, n. 4, p. 800-810, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.21577/0103-5053.20200231
dc.identifier.fileS0103-50532021000400800.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0103-5053
dc.identifier.scieloS0103-50532021000400800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/210085
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000624347400011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSoc Brasileira Quimica
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of The Brazilian Chemical Society
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcucurbit[6]uril
dc.subjectcocaine
dc.subjectlidocaine
dc.subjectcaffeine
dc.subjectprocaine
dc.subjectin silico methods
dc.titleIn silico Evaluation of Cucurbit[6]uril as a Potential Detector for Cocaine and Its Adulterants Lidocaine, Caffeine, and Procaineen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderSoc Brasileira Quimica
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, São José do Rio Pretopt
unesp.departmentFísica - IBILCEpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S0103-50532021000400800.pdf
Tamanho:
4.8 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format