Logotipo do repositório

Efficacy of In-office Bleaching Gel One Week After Mixing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

dc.contributor.authorde Freitas, IM
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro, TS
dc.contributor.authorForville, H
dc.contributor.authorFavoreto, MW
dc.contributor.authorWendlinger, M
dc.contributor.authorÑaupari-Villasante, R
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, SEP [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVallejo-Izquierdo, L
dc.contributor.authorLoguercio, AD
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-26T17:42:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-23
dc.description.abstractObjective: This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), and esthetic self-perception of in-office dental bleaching using a bleaching gel 1 week after mixing. Methods and Materials: Forty subjects underwent in-office bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF, Ultradent). In a splitmouth design, each maxillary hemiarch received bleaching gel that was mixed during, or 1 week before, the treatment session. The bleaching procedure was performed in two sessions of 40 minutes with a 7-day interval. Tooth color was assessed before treatment, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after the end of bleaching, using a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade; ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) and subjective scales (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide; ΔSGU). The risk and intensity of TS and GI were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Esthetic self-perception was assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (0-10). Results: Satisfactory bleaching was achieved in both groups, with no significant differences for objective (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID; p>0.72) or subjective (ΔSGU [shade guide units], p>0.84) color assessments. No significant differences were found in the risk and intensity of TS (p=0.79; p=0.67) or GI (p=1.0; p=0.85). Patients' esthetic self-perceptions changed after the procedure (p<0.009), mainly on the tooth color question (p<0.001). Conclusion: In-office dental bleaching with Opalescence Boost PF 40% remained effective, without differences in risk and intensity of TS and GI, even 1 week after mixing.
dc.description.affiliationIsabela M. de Freitas, DDS, MSc, PhD student, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationTaynara S. Carneiro, DDS, MSc, PhD student, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil, and Health Sciences Faculty, IDIBO research group, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
dc.description.affiliationHeloísa Forville, DDS, MSc, PhD student, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationMichael W. Favoreto, DDS, MSc, PhD, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil, and School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Parana, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationMichel Wendlinger, DDS, PhD student, School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Parana, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationRomina Ñaupari-Villasante, DDS, MSc, PhD student, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSérgio EP Gonçalves, DDS, MSc, PhD, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLuis Vallejo-Izquierdo DDS, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Odontologia, Universidad De Los Hemisferios, Quito, Ecuador
dc.description.affiliation*Alessandro D. Loguercio, DDS, MSc, PhD, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Odontologia, Universidad De Los Hemisferios, Quito, Ecuador
dc.description.affiliationUnespSérgio EP Gonçalves, DDS, MSc, PhD, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1193238060
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1193238060
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/24-115-c
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734
dc.identifier.issn1559-2863
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8327-2279
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0778-0738
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9880-4856
dc.identifier.pmid40992750
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/324707
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistry; n. 4; v. 50; p. 358-368
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleEfficacy of In-office Bleaching Gel One Week After Mixing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos