Logotipo do repositório

Distributed sampling, quantum communication witnesses, and measurement incompatibility

dc.contributor.authorGuerini, Leonardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorQuintino, Marco Túlio
dc.contributor.authorAolita, Leandro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Tokyo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:44:18Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:44:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-14
dc.description.abstractWe study prepare-and-measure experiments where the sender (Alice) receives trusted quantum inputs but has an untrusted state-preparation device and the receiver (Bob) has a fully untrusted measurement device. A distributed-sampling task naturally arises in this scenario, where the goal is for Alice and Bob to reproduce the statistics of his measurements on her quantum inputs using a fixed communication channel. Their performance of this task can certify quantum communication (QC), and this is formalized by measurement-device-independent QC witnesses. Furthermore, we prove that QC can provide an advantage (over classical communication) for distributed sampling if and only if Bob's measurements are incompatible. This gives an operational interpretation to measurement incompatibility and motivates a generalized notion of it related to a subset of quantum states. Our findings have both fundamental and applied implications.en
dc.description.affiliationInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP, R. Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 271
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physics Graduate School of Science University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 68528
dc.description.affiliationUnespInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP, R. Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 271
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPERJ: JCN E-26/202.701/2018
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: PROCAD2013
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.042308
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Review A, v. 100, n. 4, 2019.
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1121791640
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevA.100.042308
dc.identifier.issn2469-9934
dc.identifier.issn2469-9926
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8619-1132
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1332-3477
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074448939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/199601
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Society (APS)
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Review A
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgreen
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleDistributed sampling, quantum communication witnesses, and measurement incompatibilityen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication41d94a5b-139b-457c-90a7-77b71f4e94df
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery41d94a5b-139b-457c-90a7-77b71f4e94df
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Física Teórica (IFT), São Paulopt

Arquivos