Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research

dc.contributor.authorSvenning, Jens-Christian
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Pil B. M.
dc.contributor.authorDonlan, C. Josh
dc.contributor.authorEjrnaes, Rasmus
dc.contributor.authorFaurby, Soren
dc.contributor.authorGaletti, Mauro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Dennis M.
dc.contributor.authorSandel, Brody
dc.contributor.authorSandom, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorTerborgh, John W.
dc.contributor.authorVera, Frans W. M.
dc.contributor.institutionAarhus Univ
dc.contributor.institutionAdv Conservat Strategies
dc.contributor.institutionCornell Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Zurich
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Oxford
dc.contributor.institutionDuke Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Groningen
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T16:19:20Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T16:19:20Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-26
dc.description.abstractTrophic rewilding is an ecological restoration strategy that uses species introductions to restore top-down trophic interactions and associated trophic cascades to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems. Given the importance of large animals in trophic cascades and their widespread losses and resulting trophic downgrading, it often focuses on restoring functional megafaunas. Trophic rewilding is increasingly being implemented for conservation, but remains controversial. Here, we provide a synthesis of its current scientific basis, highlighting trophic cascades as the key conceptual framework, discussing the main lessons learned from ongoing rewilding projects, systematically reviewing the current literature, and highlighting unintentional rewilding and spontaneous wildlife comebacks as underused sources of information. Together, these lines of evidence show that trophic cascades may be restored via species reintroductions and ecological replacements. It is clear, however, that megafauna effects may be affected by poorly understood trophic complexity effects and interactions with landscape settings, human activities, and other factors. Unfortunately, empirical research on trophic rewilding is still rare, fragmented, and geographically biased, with the literature dominated by essays and opinion pieces. Wehighlight the need for applied programs to include hypothesis testing and science-based monitoring, and outline priorities for future research, notably assessing the role of trophic complexity, interplay with landscape settings, land use, and climate change, as well as developing the global scope for rewilding and tools to optimize benefits and reduce human-wildlife conflicts. Finally, we recommend developing a decision framework for species selection, building on functional and phylogenetic information and with attention to the potential contribution from synthetic biology.en
dc.description.affiliationAarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Sect Ecoinformat & Biodivers, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
dc.description.affiliationAdv Conservat Strategies, Midway, UT 84049 USA
dc.description.affiliationCornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
dc.description.affiliationAarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Sect Biodivers & Conservat, DK-8410 Ronde, Denmark
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Ecol, BR-13506900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
dc.description.affiliationUniv Oxford, Dept Zool, Wildlife Conservat Res Unit, Recanati Kaplan Ctr, Oxford OX13 5QL, England
dc.description.affiliationDuke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Ctr Trop Conservat, Durham, NC 27708 USA
dc.description.affiliationUniv Groningen, Groningen Inst Evolutionary Life Sci, Community & Conservat Ecol, Cocon, NL-9700 CC Groningen, Netherlands
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Ecol, BR-13506900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipAarhus University
dc.description.sponsorshipAage V. Jensen Foundations
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdEuropean Research Council: ERC-2012-StG-310886-HISTFUNC
dc.format.extent898-906
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502556112
dc.identifier.citationProceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America. Washington: Natl Acad Sciences, v. 113, n. 4, p. 898-906, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1502556112
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/161151
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000368617900034
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNatl Acad Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America
dc.relation.ispartofsjr6,092
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectmegafauna
dc.subjectreintroduction
dc.subjectrestoration
dc.subjecttrophic cascades
dc.titleScience for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding researchen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderNatl Acad Sciences
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3415-0862[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2974-2628[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8187-8696[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentEcologia - IBpt

Arquivos