Logo do repositório
 

Two approaches to evaluate perception about food

dc.contributor.authorConti, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Ana Laura Fermoselli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLamana, Breno Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarani, Luana Rachel Salgueiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDias-Faceto, Liara Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:36:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective The aims of this research were to investigate the perception about foods in Brazil through two studies: 1) to investigate the perception about the NOVA classification of foods; and 2) to investigate the perception regarding the caloric value of fast foods and restaurant meals. Methods The two studies were carried out online using Google Forms. In study 1 (n=156), participants received twenty-five food concepts and were asked to associate each one with one of the five categories: unprocessed, minimally processed, culinary ingredients, processed and ultra-processed. In study 2 (n=184), images of eight meals (four of fast foods and four of restaurant meals) were provided and participants were asked to group them, as they deemed necessary, depending on the caloric value that each meal provided. After that, the individuals were asked to rank the previously formed groups from the most caloric to the least caloric. Results Participants perceived which foods are unprocessed and ultra-processed, as proposed by NOVA classification, although there was some confusion and misunderstanding about some foods, such as powdered milk, and the culinary ingredients group. Moreover, participants did not perceive the real caloric values of fast-food meals nor restaurant meals. Meals were ranked differently from their real caloric value and participants thought, in general, that fast foods are more caloric than restaurant meals. Conclusion The studies showed that Brazilians have difficulties in perceiving information about foods, i.e., to reach the population regarding food is neither simple nor trivial, highlighting the need to educate the population about it.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Departamento de Engenharia e Tecnologia de Alimentos, SP
dc.format.extent1-12
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202437E230166
dc.identifier.citationRevista de Nutricao, v. 37, p. 1-12.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-9865202437E230166
dc.identifier.issn1415-5273
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208481553
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298120
dc.language.isoeng
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Nutricao
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAlimentos ultraprocessados
dc.subjectClassificação NOVA
dc.subjectFast Food
dc.subjectFast foods
dc.subjectNOVA classification
dc.subjectRanking test
dc.subjectSorting task
dc.subjectTeste de classificação
dc.subjectTeste de ordenação
dc.subjectUltra-processed food
dc.titleTwo approaches to evaluate perception about fooden
dc.titleDiferentes abordagens para avaliação da percepção sobre alimentospt
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8139-9687[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0046-0595[2]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0009-1945-0996[3]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0009-7287-1036[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9310-4498[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, São José do Rio Pretopt

Arquivos