Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Protocol choice influences cardiopulmonary outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients

dc.contributor.authorBertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Nuno M.F.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Guilherme B.
dc.contributor.authorPapini, Camila B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Gabriella S.
dc.contributor.authorAlbano, Danielle P.
dc.contributor.authorTogashi, Giovana B.
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Sergio E.A.
dc.contributor.authorBaldissera, Vilmar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionEstácio de Sá University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionDF
dc.contributor.institutionUFTM
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:41:43Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-01
dc.description.abstractThis study compared VO2 peak and cardiopulmonary parameters during the Bruce Protocol (BP) and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) in 8 diabetic (DG, 55.4 ± 7.0 yrs) and 13 non-diabetic (NDG, 51.5 ± 5.8 yrs) subjects. The BP VO2 peak and cardiopulmonary parameters were determined using predictive equations while the CPX VO2 peak was determined by gas analyzer. VO2 peak was significantly higher in the BP vs. the CPX for both groups. There was a significant difference in VO2 peak between groups for CPX (DG: 24.1 ± 6.4 mL·kg-1·min-1) and NDG: 32.4 ± 5.4 mL·kg-1·min-1, but not for BP (DG, 33.6 ± 8.9 mL·kg-1·min-1 and (NDG, 39.7 ± 4.5 mL·kg-1·min-1). The differences between CPX and BP corresponded to 22% for NDG and 39% for DG. Correlation between protocols was r = 0.77 for NDG and r = 0.24 for DG. Considering VO2 peak on BP, 90.5% cases changed American Heart Association (AHA) classification. Cardiopulmonary parameters were significantly different between tests. CPX was efficient in identifying differences in VO2 peak values in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. The BP may overestimate VO2 peak values and AHA classification in DG.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.description.affiliationBioengineering USP
dc.description.affiliationEstácio de Sá University
dc.description.affiliationSão Carlos Federal University - UFSCar
dc.description.affiliationCatolic University of Brasília DF
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro UFTM
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University - UNESP
dc.format.extent34-45
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 19, n. 2, p. 34-45, 2016.
dc.identifier.issn1097-9751
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84962654579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168545
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,168
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBruce protocol
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary exercise test
dc.subjectPredictive equations
dc.subjectType 2 diabetics
dc.titleProtocol choice influences cardiopulmonary outcomes in type 2 diabetes patientsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções