Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics
| dc.contributor.author | Zaniboni, Joissi Ferrari [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Silva, Amanda Soares [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Silva, Aryvelto Miranda | |
| dc.contributor.author | Besegato, João Felipe | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muñoz-Chávez, Oscar Fernando [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Campos, Edson Alves [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Federal University of Piauí (UFPI) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T18:56:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To analyze the microstructural and mechanical properties of various commercial trademarks of lithium disilicate ceramics for CAD-CAM systems. Materials and Methods: Specimens of different lithium disilicate ceramics were obtained and randomized into 5 groups (n = 14): EM: e.max CAD; RT: Rosetta SM; EV: Evolith; PM: Smile-Lithium CAD; and, HS: HaHaSmile. The microstructural analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); for flexural strength, the three-point bending flexure test was used. XRD and SEM data were qualitatively evaluated. Data from flexural strength were assessed with one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Weibull analysis. Results: High peaks corresponding to the lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate pattern with similar intensities were observed in all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM images showed similar patterns of crystalline structure in the EM and RT ceramics, while the other three groups presented different crystal morphologies than the previous ones and were similar to each other. No differences were found in flexural strength among the groups (p = 0.28). Conclusions: The CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics showed comparable crystalline intensities. The microstructure of the EM and RT ceramics were different from the other groups. Flexural strength was similar among all ceramics. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo | |
| dc.description.affiliation | School of Dentistry (FAODO) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Mato Grosso do Sul | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Piauí | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13938 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Prosthodontics. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jopr.13938 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1532-849X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1059-941X | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85203049885 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300895 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Prosthodontics | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | CAD-CAM | |
| dc.subject | ceramic | |
| dc.subject | flexural strength | |
| dc.subject | X-ray diffraction | |
| dc.title | Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-0172-9891[1] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-2757-9799[2] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-9437-0445[3] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-8747-779X[4] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquara | pt |
