Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics

dc.contributor.authorZaniboni, Joissi Ferrari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Amanda Soares [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Aryvelto Miranda
dc.contributor.authorBesegato, João Felipe
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Chávez, Oscar Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Campos, Edson Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Piauí (UFPI)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:56:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the microstructural and mechanical properties of various commercial trademarks of lithium disilicate ceramics for CAD-CAM systems. Materials and Methods: Specimens of different lithium disilicate ceramics were obtained and randomized into 5 groups (n = 14): EM: e.max CAD; RT: Rosetta SM; EV: Evolith; PM: Smile-Lithium CAD; and, HS: HaHaSmile. The microstructural analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); for flexural strength, the three-point bending flexure test was used. XRD and SEM data were qualitatively evaluated. Data from flexural strength were assessed with one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Weibull analysis. Results: High peaks corresponding to the lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate pattern with similar intensities were observed in all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM images showed similar patterns of crystalline structure in the EM and RT ceramics, while the other three groups presented different crystal morphologies than the previous ones and were similar to each other. No differences were found in flexural strength among the groups (p = 0.28). Conclusions: The CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics showed comparable crystalline intensities. The microstructure of the EM and RT ceramics were different from the other groups. Flexural strength was similar among all ceramics.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry (FAODO) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Piauí
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13938
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13938
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203049885
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300895
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCAD-CAM
dc.subjectceramic
dc.subjectflexural strength
dc.subjectX-ray diffraction
dc.titleMicrostructural and flexural strength of various CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramicsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0172-9891[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2757-9799[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9437-0445[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8747-779X[4]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos