Logo do repositório

Are CAD-CAM milled glass fiber posts better than prefabricated or custom glass fiber posts for endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review with meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorCampos, Gabriel Barboza
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Rodrigo Furtado
dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Carolina Oliveira
dc.contributor.authore Oliveira, Hiskell Francine Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Limirio, João Pedro Justino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF-GV)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF/GV)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: Prefabricated and custom glass fiber posts have been successfully used to reconstruct endodontically treated teeth. However, the performance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) milled glass fiber posts is unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the fracture and bond strength and cement layer thickness of CAD-CAM milled glass fiber posts with prefabricated or custom glass fiber posts. Material and methods: The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (http://osf.io/65jm7). Two reviewers searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and ProQuest databases for articles up to September 2023. In addition, the reference lists were hand searched. A meta-analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5.4 program. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoBDEMAT tool. Results: After screening, a total of 18 studies were included. The CAD-CAM milled glass fiber posts showed higher fracture strength (P=.02; Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 0.57; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.07 to 1.07), bond strength (P=.010; SMD: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.89), and lower cement layer thickness (P=.009; SMD: −2.94; 95% CI: −5.15 to −0.73) when compared with prefabricated glass fiber posts. However, fracture strength (P=.53; SMD: 0.38; 95% CI: −0.79 to 1.54) and bond strength (P=.90; SMD: −0.05; 95% CI: −0.81 to 0.72) were statistically similar between CAD-CAM milled and custom glass fiber posts. Significant and substantial heterogeneity was observed in all meta-analyzes (P<.01; I>60%). The studies sufficiently reported most domains related to bias, except for randomization of samples, sample size rationale and reporting and operator blinding. Conclusions: CAD-CAM milled and custom glass fiber posts provide an effective and safe option for restoring endodontically treated teeth, especially for weakened teeth or enlarged root canals. However, further well-designed clinical research is recommended to strengthen these findings.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF-GV)
dc.description.affiliationFull Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationAssociate Professor Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF-GV)
dc.description.affiliationAdjunct Professor Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF-GV)
dc.description.affiliationPostdoctoral Research Fellow Bone Research Lab School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationAdjunct Professor Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Campus Governador Valadares (UFJF/GV)
dc.description.affiliationUnespFull Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.041
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.041
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192339481
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309949
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleAre CAD-CAM milled glass fiber posts better than prefabricated or custom glass fiber posts for endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review with meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções