Logo do repositório

Effects of the application protocol and bonding strategy of the universal adhesive on dentin previously impregnated with bioceramic sealer

dc.contributor.authorOliveira Barros, Antonia Patricia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLucas de Sousa Gomes Costa, Joatan
dc.contributor.authorCamilo do Carmo Monteiro, Jardel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGalvani, Lucas David [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerrarezi de Andrade, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCury Saad, José Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:42:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effects of the application of universal adhesive with manual brush (MB) or rotary brush (RB), in the etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etching (SE) strategy, on the bond strength, adhesive layer thickness, and adhesive failure pattern to dentin impregnated with bioceramic sealer, at 24 h and 1 year. Materials and methods: Eighty-eight bovine incisor crowns were impregnated with bioceramic sealer was kept for 15 min and cleaned with cotton soaked in distilled water. They were then divided into four groups (n = 22): ER-MB, ER-RB, SE-MB, SE-RB. Subsequently, the specimens were restored with Filtek Z-250 resin. The adhesive layer thickness was individually analyzed using laser confocal microscope. Bond strength was assessed through microtensile testing, and the failure pattern was examined using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA/Tukey's tests (α = 0.05). Results: The adhesive layer thickness provided by ER-MB and SE-MB was greater than that provided by ER-RB and SE-RB (P < 0.05). ER-MB showed the lowest bond strength at 24 h (P < 0.05). At 1 year, SE-MB and SE-RB exhibited the highest bond strength values (P < 0.05). ER-MB demonstrated a higher incidence of adhesive failure at 24 h. At 1 year, SE-RB and SE-MB showed a higher incidence of mixed failure. Conclusion: The use of Scotchbond Universal® adhesive in the etch-and-rinse strategy applied with a MB negatively affects bond strength at 24 h, worsening after 1 year of control, regardless of the application protocol.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthetics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Operative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthetics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103765
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 134.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103765
dc.identifier.issn0143-7496
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85198095242
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299619
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBioceramic Sealer
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectFailure modes
dc.subjectProtocols
dc.subjectRoot canal filling material
dc.titleEffects of the application protocol and bonding strategy of the universal adhesive on dentin previously impregnated with bioceramic sealeren
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3642-365X[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos