Logo do repositório

Comparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

dc.contributor.authorBaggio, Ana Maira Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorViotto, Arthur Henrique Alécio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDelamura, Izabela Fornazari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBizelli, Vinicius Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Ricardo Garcia Mureb [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDeus, Ciro Borges Duailibe de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Rodrigo Faria [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFaverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T18:28:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractGuided bone regeneration (GBR) is a critical strategy for repairing large bone defects. This study aimed to assess the osteopromotive potential of a porcine cross-linked collagen membrane in critical calvaria-defects in rats. Seventy-two rats were divided into three groups: blood clot (CG - negative control), Bio-Gide® membrane (BG - positive control), and Ossix Plus® membrane (OSX - test). The defects were covered according to each group, and the experimental times were 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The collected samples were evaluated by histometric analysis, inflammatory profile, immunohistochemistry, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). At 7 days, no significant differences in bone neoformation were observed. At 15 days, the OSX group showed increased new bone formation compared to CG (p = 0.031). At 30 days, the BG group exhibited the most significant increase compared to both OSX (p < 0.001) and CG (p < 0.001). At 60 days, OSX demonstrated the highest osteopromotive potential, significantly outperforming CG (p < 0.001) and BG (p < 0.001). MicroCT analysis revealed that the OSX group had a bone volume (BV) of 17.33 ± 1.74 mm3, significantly higher than BG (8.06 ± 1.26 mm3, p < 0.05). The cross-linked collagen membrane was biologically more favorable for bone regeneration being a promising option for GBR procedures.
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, Aracatuba Dental School, Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, Aracatuba Dental School, Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1194802943
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1194802943
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.110
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9474-5091
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5368-5336
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8046-489X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1813-3509
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0407-6075
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2249-3048
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0031-4953
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC12594451
dc.identifier.pmid41221963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/322069
dc.publisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO)
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research; v. 39; p. e110
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgold
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleComparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
33f67a22b9e6528269026479f6e66f88e2267f5bfa5b5fa519008ecc005850e9.pdf
Tamanho:
11.44 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format