Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography
Carregando...
Fontes externas
Fontes externas
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Elsevier
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso aberto

Fontes externas
Fontes externas
Resumo
Objective: To assess the influence of anatomical location on computed tomography (CT) numbers in mid- and full field of view (FOV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Study Design: Polypropylene tubes with varying concentrations of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) solutions (50-1200 mg/mL) were imaged within the incisor, premolar, and molar dental sockets of a human skull phantom. CBCT scans were acquired using the NewTom 3G and NewTom 5G units. The CT numbers of the K2HPO 4 phantoms were measured, and the relationship between CT numbers and K2HPO4 concentration was examined. The measured CT numbers of the K2HPO4 phantoms were compared between anatomical sites. Results: At all six anatomical locations, there was a strong linear relationship between CT numbers and K2HPO4 concentration (R 2 > 0.93). However, the absolute CT numbers varied considerably with the anatomical location. Conclusion: The relationship between CT numbers and object density is not uniform through the dental arch on CBCT scans. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
hydroxyapatite phosphate potassium derivative potassium dihydrogen phosphate chemistry comparative study cone beam computed tomography equipment human image processing image quality incisor molar tooth premolar tooth radiation dose radiation scattering radiography statistics three dimensional imaging tooth arch tooth socket X ray Bicuspid Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dental Arch Durapatite Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Imaging, Three-Dimensional Incisor Molar Phantoms, Imaging Phosphates Potassium Compounds Radiation Dosage Scattering, Radiation Tooth Socket X-Rays
Idioma
Inglês
Citação
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, v. 115, n. 4, p. 558-564, 2013.







