There was an error in the original publication [1]. It was stated that two serum samples obtained from wild boars hunted in the municipality of Paraíso tested positive in the RFFIT, instead of one. A correction has been made to the first paragraph of Section 3, as follows: However, seven serum samples obtained from wild boars hunted in Monte Azul (four samples), Paraíso (one sample), Cajobi (one sample), and Colina (one sample). In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. On the map, the municipality of Paraíso shows two positive samples instead of one. The corrected Figure 2 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.