Logo do repositório

Economic viability of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems From consortiums in the pasture phase in Mato Grosso, Brazil

dc.contributor.authorMonteiro de Araujo Souza, Sandra Maria
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Aguinaldo Rocha
dc.contributor.authorSabbag, Omar Jorge [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Leandro Pereira
dc.contributor.authorWruck, Flavio de Jesus
dc.contributor.authorWingert, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorBau Macedo, Luis Otavio
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Laercio Santos
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Edicarlos Damacena de
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Fed Rondonopolis UFR
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe particularities of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems (SIPA) influence implementation costs and production profitability. However, there are few scientific approaches that seek to elucidate the total cost of SIPA to assist in decision-making regarding the most appropriate modality to be installed. The purpose of the study was to propose the application of the appropriate costing method to SIPA for an integrated assessment of the economic and financial viability of SIPA with single and intercropped pastures under direct planting in Mato Grosso. Between 2015 and 2017, four types of SIPA in the pasture phase were evaluated for economic viability. Based on the cash flow, economic viability indicators were calculated: Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit/Cost Index (IBC) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The absorption costing method allowed a comprehensive assessment of SIPA production costs, and through the apportionment criterion, indirect costs were integrated into all production activities. SIPA have different levels of profitability, depending on the grass and the intercrop used. The overall net results in the 15/16 and 16/17 harvests ranged from R$ 701.81 to 1,889.01 in single pastures and from 1,435.86 to 2,129.39 in intercropped pastures. The systems showed the capacity to remunerate investments, especially when using Piata grass or a consortium between grasses and legumes with better economic indicators.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Parana UFPR, Rua XV Novembro,1299 Ctr, BR-80060000 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Rondonopolis UFR, Ave Estudantes,5055 Cidade Univ, BR-78736900 Rondonopolis, MT, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Unesp, Ave Brasil Ctr 56, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Arroz & Feijao, Km 12 Zona Rural,GO 462, BR-75375000 Santo Antonio De Goias, Go, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Unesp, Ave Brasil Ctr 56, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent2-31
dc.identifier.citationCustos E Agronegocio On Line. Bairro De Dois Irmaos: Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao, v. 19, n. 1, p. 2-31, 2023.
dc.identifier.issn1808-2882
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/297950
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001086284500013
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniv Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
dc.relation.ispartofCustos E Agronegocio On Line
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectThick. Agricultural Credit. SIPA.
dc.titleEconomic viability of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems From consortiums in the pasture phase in Mato Grosso, Brazilen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Ilha Solteirapt

Arquivos