Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions: Comparing Low-Load Plus Blood Flow Restriction with High-Load Plans
Carregando...
Arquivos
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf (1,65 MB)
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf (1,65 MB)
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf
Fontes externas
Fontes externas
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
MDPI
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso aberto

Arquivos
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf (1,65 MB)
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf (1,65 MB)
Perceptual and Metabolic Responses During Resistance Training Sessions.pdf
Fontes externas
Fontes externas
Resumo
This study analysed perceived exertion (RPE) and blood lactate ([La<sup>-</sup>]) responses to two resistance training protocols planned with high- (HLI) and low-load intensities combined with blood flow restriction (LLI+BFR). Fourteen trained adults (26.2 ± 2.6 years) performed the HLI and LLI+BFR protocols 48 h apart. The HLI was planned with 70% 1RM (one repetition to maximum), three sets, 12 repetitions, 60 seconds (s) of rest between sets and 120 s between exercises; LLI+BFR was performed at 30% 1RM, for three sets, 15 repetitions, and with 30 s of rest between sets and 180 s between exercises. Blood samples (for [La<sup>-</sup>] analysis) and RPE (Borg 0-10 scale) were collected in the first minute after each exercise. A two-way ANOVA compared RPE and [La<sup>-</sup>] responses between exercises in the same protocol, and between protocols comparing the same exercise. RPE increased from the first to the last half (involving upper-limbs and lower-limbs) of exercises in both protocols (<i>p</i> < 0.001). All exercises in HLI elicited higher RPE values than LLI+BFR (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Average RPE scores were higher in HLI than for LLI+BFR (8.1 ± 0.6 > 6.2 ± 1.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The [La<sup>-</sup>] also increased throughout the exercises, with a higher peak response in LLI+BFR than for HLI (9.8 ± 1.6 > 7.2 ± 1.3 mmol × L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Perceptual and metabolic responses during HLI and LLI+BFR training were distinguishable, despite both protocols characterising a high-intensity stimulus.





