Publicação: A worldwide meta-analysis review of restriction criteria for landfill siting using geographic information systems
dc.contributor.author | Fernandez Nascimento, Victor | |
dc.contributor.author | Loureiro, Anna Isabel Silva [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Andrade, Pedro R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guasselli, Laurindo Antonio | |
dc.contributor.author | Ometto, Jean Pierre Balbaud | |
dc.contributor.institution | Rio Grande do Sul Federal University (UFRGS) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Integrated Colleges of Taquara (FACCAT) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor.institution | National Institute for Space Research (INPE) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T10:14:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T10:14:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of the most crucial parts of solid waste management is determining landfill site location, since multiple factors must be considered and there is no universal formula. The main purpose of this study is to make a worldwide systematic review of restriction criteria used for landfill siting using geographic information systems (GIS). Literature from the last years was thoroughly assessed, and 45 restrictions found were classified as environmental, economic, or social criteria. Our findings show that although the number of articles published has increased recently, they use on average seven restrictions, focusing mainly on environmental over economic and social criteria. In our boxplot statistical analysis, the most frequently used environmental restrictions are the distance from surface water resources (used in 77% of articles), slope (52%), and distance from groundwater founts (40%), with a median of 300 m, 20%, and 250 m, respectively. The most frequently used economic restrictions are distances from roads (60%), airports (40%), and power lines (18%), with medians of 275 m, 3000 m, and 75 m, respectively. The most frequently used social restrictions are distances from urban areas (45%), settlements and residential areas (40%), and cultural heritage or archaeological areas (23%), with medians of 1000 m. This information might help, on the one hand, governments to develop new legislation about landfill siting and on the other hand, decision-makers and scientists to produce new studies with different restrictive scenarios. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Remote Sensing and Meteorological State Center (CEPSRM) Rio Grande do Sul Federal University (UFRGS) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Regional Development Department Integrated Colleges of Taquara (FACCAT) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Environmental Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Earth System Science Center (CCST) National Institute for Space Research (INPE) | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Environmental Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | CAPES: 88882.316284/2019-01 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | CNPq: PIBIC-INPE/CNPq nº 103660/2018-6 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | CNPq: Universal Project nº 409690/2018-0 | |
dc.format.extent | 409-426 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20962834 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Waste Management and Research, v. 39, n. 3, p. 409-426, 2021. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0734242X20962834 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1096-3669 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0734-242X | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85093978551 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205380 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Waste Management and Research | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | economic criteria | |
dc.subject | Environmental criteria | |
dc.subject | GIS | |
dc.subject | social criteria | |
dc.subject | spatial analysis | |
dc.title | A worldwide meta-analysis review of restriction criteria for landfill siting using geographic information systems | en |
dc.type | Resenha | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-3311-8190[1] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-8675-4046[3] |