Logo do repositório

Pharmacodynamics of propofol and alfaxalone in rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus)

dc.contributor.authorBertelsen, Mads F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Rasmus [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Heidi M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Cleo A.C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbe, Augusto S.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tobias [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionCopenhagen Zoo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aarhus
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:56:03Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.description.abstractTo characterise the effect of two common induction agents, propofol and alfaxalone, on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), we equipped 19 adult South American rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus) with an indwelling arterial catheter approximately 24 h prior to recording of baseline resting values. Then, seven snakes received alfaxalone (15 mg kg−1) intravascularly (IV) through the catheter, while groups two and three (both n = 6) received propofol (15 mg kg−1 IV). The first two groups were not handled, while the group 3 was manually restrained for 2 min for a mock injection of 0.2 ml saline into the ventral tail vein. Baseline HR was similar in all groups and handling caused a significant tachycardia (p = 0.031) in group three. When given IV to undisturbed animals, both propofol and alfaxalone induced a significant increase in HR (p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0045, respectively) lasting approximately 30 min, but with values only significantly exceeding baseline for the first 5 min for propofol and the first 10 min with alfaxalone. Handling caused a significant increase in MAP (p = 0.0313). Propofol did not affect MAP (p = 0.1064), while alfaxalone caused a marked hypertension (although only significant at 2 min; p = 0.031). Manual restraint significantly increases both HR and MAP, which may lead to a masking of true cardiovascular effects of anaesthetic agents.en
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health Copenhagen Zoo
dc.description.affiliationZoophysiology Department of Biology University of Aarhus
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physiological Sciences UFSCar
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Zoologia Centro de Aquicultura UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Zoologia Centro de Aquicultura UNESP
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.110935
dc.identifier.citationComparative Biochemistry and Physiology -Part A : Molecular and Integrative Physiology, v. 256.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.110935
dc.identifier.issn1531-4332
dc.identifier.issn1095-6433
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102884032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207487
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Biochemistry and Physiology -Part A : Molecular and Integrative Physiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnaesthesia
dc.subjectBlood pressure
dc.subjectCardiovascular
dc.subjectDisturbance
dc.subjectHeart rate
dc.subjectReptile
dc.titlePharmacodynamics of propofol and alfaxalone in rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus)en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos