Logo do repositório
 

Comparative study of ultrasonographic methods for assessment of pregnancy age in bitches

dc.contributor.authorCastro, Viviane Montich de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMamprim, Maria Jaqueline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSartor, Raquel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:56:53Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:56:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01
dc.description.abstractCompared with human beings, the application of ultrasound in estimating fetal age in bitches is limited due to the large variation of breed and size in this species. Several formulas were developed to calculate the gestational age and to provide the date of birth in dogs, but the efficacy of these formulas on the different gestational stages and dog breeds is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare sonographic methods for assessment of gestational age and days before parturition in dogs with different body weights and pregnancy stages. Twenty seven bitches of several sizes were examined and divided into three groups according to the initial body weight (A: <10kg; B: 10.1 - 20kg; C: >20.1kg); then each group was divided into three subgroups according to pregnancy stage (1st: 18 to 30 days; 2nd: 31 to 40 days; 3rd: >40 days) estimated according to the first day of copulation. Ultrasonography was performed weekly from the first stage of pregnancy. In the first and second stage the following formulas were applied: GA = (6XGSD) + 20; DBP = 65 - IG; by Nyland & Matton (2002); GA: gestational age; DBP: days before parturition; DSG: gestational sac diameter; in the third stage: DBP = 61,2 - (24,6 X BD); DBP = 43,5 - (10,9 X CD); by Burk & Ackerman (1996); BD: biparietal diameter; CD: body diameter, and: GA = (15 X BD) + 20; GA = (7 X CD) + 29; GA = (6 X BD) + (3 X CD) + 30; DBP = 65 - GA; by Nyland & Matton (2002). Results were compared statistically. The equations proposed by Nyland & Matton (2002), were more accurate in all pregnancy stages, with a margin of error of only three days, regardless of the size of the animal; therefore these methods are the best option in veterinary practice.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho FM, UNESP, Campus De Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho FM, UNESP, Campus De Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent78-80
dc.identifierhttp://www.revista.dmv.ufrpe.br/index.php/rdmv/article/view/136
dc.identifier.citationMedicina Veterinaria-recife. Recife Pe: Univ Federal Rural Pernambuco, v. 5, n. 4, p. 78-80, 2011.
dc.identifier.fileWOS000209050900014.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1809-4678
dc.identifier.lattes8854318602850671
dc.identifier.lattes6666129914663018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/117765
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000209050900014
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniv Federal Rural Pernambuco
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Veterinaria-recife
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,102
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectUltrasounden
dc.subjectbitchesen
dc.subjectpregnancyen
dc.subjectdiagnosisen
dc.subjectgestational ageen
dc.titleComparative study of ultrasonographic methods for assessment of pregnancy age in bitchesen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Federal Rural Pernambuco
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes8854318602850671
unesp.author.lattes6666129914663018
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentReprodução Animal e Radiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000209050900014.pdf
Tamanho:
193.2 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format