Publicação:
Tomographic follow-up of bone regeneration after bone block harvesting from the mandibular ramus

dc.contributor.authorDiez, G. F.
dc.contributor.authorFontao, F. N. G. K.
dc.contributor.authorBassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGama, J. C.
dc.contributor.authorClaudino, M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Planalto Catarinense UNIPLAC
dc.contributor.institutionLatin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ ILAPEO
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:09:02Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:09:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-01
dc.description.abstractAutogenous bone is still considered the gold standard, and the applicability of autogenous bone grafts is well established. However, the possibility of second harvesting from the same donor region remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective evaluation of hard tissue deposition in the mandibular ramus after bone block harvesting using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty-two patients with indications for augmentation procedures using autogenous bone from the mandibular ramus were selected. Three CBCT scans were performed with a tomographic guide before bone harvesting (T1) and at 14 days (T2) and 6 months (T3) after the surgical procedures. Measurements were obtained in 2D (area, mm(2)) and 3D (volume, mm(3)), and were subsequently compared. In the 2D analysis, the mean bone formation rate was 56%, while for the 3D analysis the mean rate was 9.7%. Despite this difference, there was a significant correlation between area and volume measurements. Our findings demonstrated the presence of hard tissue in the mandibular ramus at 6 months after bone harvesting, which suggests that it would be possible to reuse the same region for a second block harvesting. However, the second bone harvesting would involve less bone for transplantation when compared to the first bone harvesting.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Planalto Catarinense UNIPLAC, Dept Oral Surg, Lages, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLatin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ ILAPEO, Postgrad Dept, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationState Univ Sao Paulo UNESP, Dept Oral Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLatin Amer Inst Dent Res & Educ ILAPEO, BR-80710150 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespState Univ Sao Paulo UNESP, Dept Oral Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent335-340
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.010
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, v. 43, n. 3, p. 335-340, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.010
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/111846
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000331854000011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.164
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,137
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbone transplantationen
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomographyen
dc.subjectbone regenerationen
dc.titleTomographic follow-up of bone regeneration after bone block harvesting from the mandibular ramusen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderChurchill Livingstone
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes8729832671690181[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0031-4953[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt

Arquivos