Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Invasive wild boar's distribution overlap with threatened native ungulate in Patagonia

dc.contributor.authorBercê, William [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBello, Carolina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Calebe P [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVancine, Maurício H [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGaletti, Mauro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBallari, Sebastián A
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Miami
dc.contributor.institutionNahuel Huapi National Park (CENAC-APN)
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T10:19:00Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T10:19:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01
dc.description.abstractWild boar (Sus scrofa) is one of the most damaging invasive species in the world and can have a profound impact on the distribution of native species. Nevertheless, there still are limitations on the species' current fine-scale spatial information, which is needed to develop effective management measures. Here, we used Species Distribution Models (SDMs) and niche overlap analysis to estimate potential conflict areas between the wild boar and the native southern pudu (Pudu puda), which is a bioindicator of the forest conservation status within the Nahuel Huapi National Park (NHNP), Argentina. The two species' environmental niche overlaps by 40%, which results in a wide geographical overlap between wild boar and pudu distributions. The distribution model predicted that the wild boar potential distribution occupies 22% of the national park and overlaps up to 67% with the pudu distribution, which in turn occupies 20% of the park. Based on our models, we classified 12% of the park as extreme management priority areas, because both species are present. High priority areas, where wild boars have the potential to invade but will not overlap with pudu populations, represent 10% of the park. Medium priority areas, where wild boars do not threaten pudu populations, and low priority areas, with no potential presence of either species, are 8% and 68%, respectively. The results of this study show how SDMs developed at local scales can support the management and monitoring of native and invasive species and help guide the allocation of efforts and resources for management actions focused on protected areas.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biodiversity São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Biosciences, SP
dc.description.affiliationSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology University of Miami
dc.description.affiliationNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) Nahuel Huapi National Park (CENAC-APN), Río Negro
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biodiversity São Paulo State University (UNESP) Institute of Biosciences, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Science Foundation: 173342
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/22492-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2017/09676-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2017/12925-0
dc.format.extent1298-1308
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab099
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Mammalogy, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1298-1308, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jmammal/gyab099
dc.identifier.issn1545-1542
dc.identifier.issn0022-2372
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119158231
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/233800
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mammalogy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectconservación
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectmammals
dc.subjectmamíferos
dc.subjectmanejo de vida silvestre
dc.subjectmodelos de distribución de especie
dc.subjectPudu puda
dc.subjectspecies distribution modeling
dc.subjectSus scrofa
dc.subjectwildlife management
dc.titleInvasive wild boar's distribution overlap with threatened native ungulate in Patagoniaen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2837-3928[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6351-4998 0000-0001-6351-4998[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1323-3287[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8187-8696 0000-0002-8187-8696[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentEcologia - IBpt

Arquivos