Logo do repositório

Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A rapid scoping review

dc.contributor.authorKeene, Claire Marriott
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Reshania
dc.contributor.authorAndersen-Waine, Billie
dc.contributor.authorFerguson-Lewis, Angus
dc.contributor.authorPolner, Anastasia
dc.contributor.authorAmswych, Ma'Ayan
dc.contributor.authorMolyneux, Sassy
dc.contributor.authorWanat, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMoldokmatova, Ainura
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Ben
dc.contributor.authorGao, Bo
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Caroline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Emily
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Jared
dc.contributor.authorStepniewska, Kasia
dc.contributor.authorBimpong, Kweku
dc.contributor.authorCantrell, Liberty
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Lisa J
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Joseph L-H
dc.contributor.authorMills, Melinda C
dc.contributor.authorVoysey, Merryn
dc.contributor.authorKasim, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorDahal, Prabin
dc.contributor.authorHounsell, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Richard
dc.contributor.authorShretta, Rima
dc.contributor.authorAnye, Randolph Ngwafor
dc.contributor.authorAguas, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorCreswell, Richard
dc.contributor.authorDittrich, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorChen, Siyu
dc.contributor.authorSilal, Sheetal
dc.contributor.authorSaralamba, Sompob
dc.contributor.authorBajaj, Sumali
dc.contributor.authorPokharel, Sunil
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Tracy
dc.contributor.authorMahmood, Umar
dc.contributor.authorPan-Ngum, Wirichada
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Oxford
dc.contributor.institutionErnst & Young (EY)
dc.contributor.institutionErnst & Young LLP
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Exeter
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.contributor.institutionRichard Lewis Consulting Ltd.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:35:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-29
dc.description.abstractObjective Testing for COVID-19 was a key component of the UK's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy relied on positive individuals self-isolating to reduce transmission, making isolation the lynchpin in the public health approach. Therefore, we scoped evidence to systematically identify and categorise barriers and facilitators to compliance with self-isolation guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, to inform public health strategies in future pandemics. Design A rapid scoping review was conducted. Search strategy Key terms were used to search literature databases (PubMed, Scopus and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database, on 7 November 2022), Google Scholar and stakeholder-identified manuscripts, ultimately including evidence published in English from UK-based studies conducted between 2020 and 2022. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted and synthesised into themes, organised broadly into capability, opportunity and motivation, and reviewed with key stakeholders from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). Results We included 105 sources, with 63 identified from UKHSA and used to inform their decision-making during the pandemic. Influences on the decision to comply with isolation guidance were categorised into six themes: perceived ability to isolate; information and guidance; logistics; social influences, including trust; perceived value; and perceived consequences. Individuals continuously assessed these factors in deciding whether or not to comply with guidance and self-isolate. Conclusions Decisions to self-isolate after a positive test were influenced by multiple factors, including individuals' beliefs, concerns, priorities and personal circumstances. Future testing strategies must facilitate meaningful financial, practical and mental health support to allow individuals to overcome the perceived and actual negative consequences of isolating. Clear, consistent communication of the purpose and procedures of isolating will also be critical to support compliance with self-isolation guidance, and should leverage people's perceived value in protecting others. Building public trust is also essential, but requires investment before the next pandemic starts.en
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Global Health Research Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationUKI Health Sciences and Wellness Ernst & Young (EY)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationPandemic Sciences Institute University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationBig Data Institute Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationEY Seren Ernst & Young LLP
dc.description.affiliationCollege of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences University of Exeter
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Statistics University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Theoretical Physics São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationModelling and Simulation Hub Africa (MASHA) University of Cape Town
dc.description.affiliationInfectious Diseases Data Observatory Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Paediatrics University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationNuffield Department of Primary Care University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science (LCDS) University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationOxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physics University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationRichard Lewis Consulting Ltd.
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Computer Science University of Oxford
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Theoretical Physics São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open, v. 14, n. 3, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189720520
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/304646
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleDecision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A rapid scoping reviewen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0875-5884[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3368-0255 0000-0002-3368-0255[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0163-1547 0000-0002-0163-1547[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Física Teórica, São Paulopt

Arquivos