Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A rapid scoping review
| dc.contributor.author | Keene, Claire Marriott | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dickinson, Sophie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naidoo, Reshania | |
| dc.contributor.author | Andersen-Waine, Billie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ferguson-Lewis, Angus | |
| dc.contributor.author | Polner, Anastasia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amswych, Ma'Ayan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Molyneux, Sassy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wanat, Marta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moldokmatova, Ainura | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lambert, Ben | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gao, Bo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Franco, Caroline [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rowe, Emily | |
| dc.contributor.author | Norman, Jared | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stepniewska, Kasia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bimpong, Kweku | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cantrell, Liberty | |
| dc.contributor.author | White, Lisa J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsui, Joseph L-H | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mills, Melinda C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Voysey, Merryn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kasim, Muhammad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dahal, Prabin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hounsell, Rachel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lewis, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shretta, Rima | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anye, Randolph Ngwafor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aguas, Ricardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Creswell, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dittrich, Sabine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Siyu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Silal, Sheetal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saralamba, Sompob | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bajaj, Sumali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pokharel, Sunil | |
| dc.contributor.author | Evans, Tracy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahmood, Umar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pan-Ngum, Wirichada | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Oxford | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Ernst & Young (EY) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Ernst & Young LLP | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Exeter | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Richard Lewis Consulting Ltd. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T19:35:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-03-29 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective Testing for COVID-19 was a key component of the UK's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy relied on positive individuals self-isolating to reduce transmission, making isolation the lynchpin in the public health approach. Therefore, we scoped evidence to systematically identify and categorise barriers and facilitators to compliance with self-isolation guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, to inform public health strategies in future pandemics. Design A rapid scoping review was conducted. Search strategy Key terms were used to search literature databases (PubMed, Scopus and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database, on 7 November 2022), Google Scholar and stakeholder-identified manuscripts, ultimately including evidence published in English from UK-based studies conducted between 2020 and 2022. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted and synthesised into themes, organised broadly into capability, opportunity and motivation, and reviewed with key stakeholders from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). Results We included 105 sources, with 63 identified from UKHSA and used to inform their decision-making during the pandemic. Influences on the decision to comply with isolation guidance were categorised into six themes: perceived ability to isolate; information and guidance; logistics; social influences, including trust; perceived value; and perceived consequences. Individuals continuously assessed these factors in deciding whether or not to comply with guidance and self-isolate. Conclusions Decisions to self-isolate after a positive test were influenced by multiple factors, including individuals' beliefs, concerns, priorities and personal circumstances. Future testing strategies must facilitate meaningful financial, practical and mental health support to allow individuals to overcome the perceived and actual negative consequences of isolating. Clear, consistent communication of the purpose and procedures of isolating will also be critical to support compliance with self-isolation guidance, and should leverage people's perceived value in protecting others. Building public trust is also essential, but requires investment before the next pandemic starts. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Centre for Global Health Research Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | UKI Health Sciences and Wellness Ernst & Young (EY) | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Biology University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Pandemic Sciences Institute University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Big Data Institute Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | EY Seren Ernst & Young LLP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences University of Exeter | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Statistics University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Institute of Theoretical Physics São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Modelling and Simulation Hub Africa (MASHA) University of Cape Town | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Infectious Diseases Data Observatory Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Nuffield Department of Primary Care University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science (LCDS) University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Oxford Vaccine Group Department of Paediatrics University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Physics University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Richard Lewis Consulting Ltd. | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Computer Science University of Oxford | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Institute of Theoretical Physics São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Open, v. 14, n. 3, 2024. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85189720520 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/304646 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMJ Open | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.title | Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A rapid scoping review | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-0875-5884[1] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-3368-0255 0000-0002-3368-0255[3] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-0163-1547 0000-0002-0163-1547[9] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Física Teórica, São Paulo | pt |

