Logotipo do repositório

An Evaluation of the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on the Peri-Implant Bone Healing of Implants with Different Surfaces: An In Vivo Study

dc.contributor.authorPoli, Pier Paolo
dc.contributor.authorde Jesus, Laís Kawamata [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDayube, Ulisses Ribeiro Campos
dc.contributor.authorHadad, Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Caroline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorChiba, Fernando Yamamoto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Thayane Silveira Mata
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Maísa Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMaiorana, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Paulo Sergio Perri
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionFondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Milan
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSão Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T21:03:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T21:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-01
dc.description.abstract(1) Background: This study evaluates the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on the peri-implant bone healing of implants with a machined surface (MS) and treated surface (TS). (2) Methods: Topographic characterization of the surfaces (scanning electron microscopy [SEM]-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy [EDX]) was performed before and after implant removal. Twenty rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: MS and TS groups (without PBM therapy) and LMS and LTS groups (with PBM therapy). After implant placement, the stability coefficient (ISQ) was measured. In the periods of 21 and 42 days, the ISQ was measured again, followed by biomechanical analysis. (3) Results: The surfaces of the TS implants showed topographic differences compared with MS implants. The ISQ values of the LMS were statistically significant when compared with those of the MS at 42 days (p < 0.001). The removal torque values of the LMS were statistically significant when compared with those of the MS at 21 days (p = 0.023) and 42 days (p = 0.023). For SEM, in general, the LMS, TS and LTS presented high bone tissue coverage when compared to MS. (4) Conclusions: The PBM therapy modulated the osseointegration process and was evidenced mainly on the machined surface.en
dc.description.affiliationImplant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences University of Milan
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.description.affiliationImplant Dentistry Postgraduate Program São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center, Campinas SP 13
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba SP 16
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15134371
dc.identifier.citationMaterials, v. 15, n. 13, 2022.
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1148888389
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma15134371
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1775-3108
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1427-071X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6007-6336
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3739-1490
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8748-9483
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9035-2960
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6773-6966
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0459-5860
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4406-405X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6446-3643
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC9267620
dc.identifier.pmid35806496
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135270313
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241450
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgold
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectGallium–aluminum–arsenide
dc.subjectLow-level laser therapy
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectPhotobiomodulation therapy
dc.subjectTopographic characterization
dc.titleAn Evaluation of the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on the Peri-Implant Bone Healing of Implants with Different Surfaces: An In Vivo Studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCiências Básicas - FOApt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOApt

Arquivos