Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Osteoporosis Screening: Applied Methods and Technological Trends

dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Mario A.
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Raimes
dc.contributor.authorCastanha, Everton B.
dc.contributor.authorPrevedello, Alexandra S.
dc.contributor.authorVieira Filho, Jozue [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBussolaro, Frederico A.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cava, David
dc.contributor.institutionBirmingham City University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Pelotas
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Mato Grosso
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionThe University of Edinburgh
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T14:03:56Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T14:03:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-01
dc.description.abstractBones are continuously remodeled (resorbed and regenerated) to allow fracture healing and skeleton adaptation to stress. When excessive resorption occurs, bone microstructure is deteriorated, leading to osteoporosis. At early stages, osteoporosis usually has no symptoms; most people are diagnosed when a fracture occurs due to disease severity. To prevent fractures, technologies have been developed to identify high risk population eligible to treatment. Fracture risk has been assessed by analyzing the interaction of different energy stimulus with bone tissues as well as by statistical models that evaluate multiple clinical risk factors. The most applied methods are Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Fracture Risk Assessment tool. As they present some limitations, other technologies have been proposed for such purpose. A survey of the currently applied and emerging methods is here presented in order to provide a scenario of the technological challenges and trends to diagnose osteoporosis.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Engineering and the Built Environment Birmingham City University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Federal University of Pelotas
dc.description.affiliationHealth Science Institute Federal University of Mato Grosso
dc.description.affiliationTelecommunications and Aeronautical Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP), So Jȴao da BoaVista
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Engineering The Institute for Infrastructure and Environment The University of Edinburgh
dc.description.affiliationUnespTelecommunications and Aeronautical Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP), So Jȴao da BoaVista
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103887
dc.identifier.citationMedical Engineering and Physics, v. 108.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103887
dc.identifier.issn1873-4030
dc.identifier.issn1350-4533
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138098939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249154
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Engineering and Physics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBones
dc.subjectDXA
dc.subjectelectromechanical impedance
dc.subjectfracture risk
dc.subjectosteoporosis diagnosis
dc.titleOsteoporosis Screening: Applied Methods and Technological Trendsen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3619-3989[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3841-6824[7]
unesp.departmentEngenharia Elétrica - FEISpt

Arquivos