Mechanical behavior of implant-supported full-arch prostheses in different locations in the maxilla: 3D-FEA and strain gauge analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Grande, Mateus Favero Barra [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lopes, Guilherme Da Rocha Scalzer [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pelegrine, André Antônio [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | De Matos, Jefferson David Melo [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nishioka, Renato Sussumo [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | São Leopoldo Mandic University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T20:01:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-03-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The maxillary bone restriction can limit the implants position to support a full-arch prosthesis. Objective: Therefore, this study evaluated the biomechanical behavior of a full-arch prosthesis supported by six implants in different configurations: group A (implants inserted in the region of canines, first premolars and second molars), group B (implants inserted in the region of first premolar, first molar and second molar) and group C (implants in second premolar, first premolar and second molar). Material and Methods: The models were analyzed by the finite element method validated by strain gauge. Three types of loads were applied: in the central incisors, first premolars and second molars, obtaining results of von-Mises stress peaks and microstrain. All registered results reported higher stress concentration in the prosthesis of all groups, with group C presenting higher values in all structures when compared to A and B groups. The highest mean microstrain was also observed in group C (288.8 ± 225.2 με/με), however, there was no statistically significant difference between the evaluated groups. In both groups, regardless of the magnitude and direction of the load, the maximum von-Mises stresses recorded for implants and prosthesis displacements were lower in group A. Conclusion: It was concluded that an equidistant distribution of implants favors biomechanical behavior of full-arch prostheses supported by implants; and the placement of posterior implants seems to be a viable alternative to rehabilitate totally edentulous individuals. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | São Paulo State University Department of Dental Materials Prosthodontics Institute of Science,Technology, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | São Leopoldo Mandic University Department of Dental Prosthodontics, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | São Paulo State University Department of Dental Materials Prosthodontics Institute of Science,Technology, SP | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
| dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2018/04454-0 | |
| dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2019/24903-6 | |
| dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: 2021/11499-2 | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3771 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Brazilian Dental Science, v. 26, n. 2, 2023. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4322/bds.2023.e3771 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2178-6011 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85163691060 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/304845 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian Dental Science | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Biomechanical phenomena | |
| dc.subject | Dental implants | |
| dc.subject | Dental prosthesis | |
| dc.subject | Finite element analysis | |
| dc.subject | Maxilla | |
| dc.title | Mechanical behavior of implant-supported full-arch prostheses in different locations in the maxilla: 3D-FEA and strain gauge analysis | en |
| dc.title | Comportamento mecânico de próteses de arco inteiro implanto-suportadas em localizações diferentes na maxila: análise 3D-FEA e strain gauge | pt |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
