Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Finite Element Analysis to Compare Complete Denture and Implant-Retained Overdentures With Different Attachment Systems

dc.contributor.authorRicardo Barao, Valentim Adelino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTabata, Lucas Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDelben, Juliana Aparecida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Edson Antonio Capello [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:35Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:51Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:35Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-01
dc.description.abstractThis finite element analysis compared stress distribution on complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. Four models of edentulous mandible were constructed: group A (control), complete denture; group B, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip system; group C, overdenture retained by 2 unsplinted implants with o'ring system; and group D, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip and 2 distally placed o'ring system. Evaluation was performed on Ansys software, with 100-N vertical load applied on central incisive teeth. The lowest maximum general stress value (in megapascal) was observed in group A (64.305) followed by groups C (119.006), D (258.650), and B (349.873). The same trend occurred it) supporting tissues with the highest stress value for cortical bone. Unsplinted implants associated with the o'ring attachment system showed the lowest maximum stress values among all overdenture groups. Furthermore, o'ring system also improved stress distribution when associated with bar-clip system.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent1066-1071
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 20, n. 4, p. 1066-1071, 2009.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.lattes4438747643373395
dc.identifier.lattes3383392287039820
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15216
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000268400400025
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.772
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,448
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectcomplete dentureen
dc.subjectoverdentureen
dc.subjectattachmenten
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen
dc.titleFinite Element Analysis to Compare Complete Denture and Implant-Retained Overdentures With Different Attachment Systemsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://edmgr.ovid.com/spine/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes8934648262859482
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8903-0737[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6510-3727[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6391-9917[1]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Baurupt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentEngenharia Mecânica - FEBpt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: