Logo do repositório

Beta diversity of macrophyte life forms: Responses to local, spatial, and land use variables in Amazon aquatic environments

dc.contributor.authorBomfim, Francieli F.
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Lucimar S.
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Fabiane B.
dc.contributor.authorJuen, Leandro
dc.contributor.authorDias-Silva, Karina
dc.contributor.authorCasatti, Lilian [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarmo, Rayssa S.
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Raimundo L.M.
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Guilherme S.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Antônio A.S.
dc.contributor.authorMichelan, Thaisa S.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractAquatic macrophytes encompass a highly diverse group of plants with different strategies, niche requirements, and dispersion capacities. Therefore, macrophyte life forms can respond distinctly to environmental factors. We analyzed whether emergent/amphibious, floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes respond differently to local, spatial, and land use variables in ponds and streams of the Amazon. We sampled macrophytes and physical and chemical variables in 158 sites in the Pará state, Brazil. Land use and land cover were obtained via satellite images. A total of 264 macrophyte taxa were recorded, including 234 amphibious/emergent, 17 floating-leaves/rooted submerged, and 13 free-floating/free-submerged. The highest total beta diversity was recorded for amphibious/emergent species (0.47), followed by free-floating and floating submerged (0.41), and floating-leaves and rooted submerged species (0.39). The replacement component explained the greatest proportion of total beta for the three macrophyte groups, with values higher than 60 %. The spatial component greatly influenced the total beta diversity of amphibious/emergent (R2 = 0.06) and floating-leaves/rooted submerged life forms (R2 = 0.08). Meanwhile, local variables were more associated with the total beta diversity of free-floating/free-submerged macrophytes (R2 = 0.06). Free-floating and free-submerged life forms were the only groups influenced by land use changes (R2 = 0.02), and their richness difference between sites was spatially structured (R2 = 0.10). Our study is one of the first to explore the combined effects of local, spatial, and land use variables on macrophyte life forms. These results are important for deeply understanding macrophyte structure in Amazon environments, threatened by anthropic activities and planning conservation strategies.en
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia de Produtores Primários (ECOPRO) Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal do Pará, R. Augusto Corrêa, 01, Pará
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LABECO) Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal do Pará, R. Augusto Corrêa, 01, Pará
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Pará- Altamira, R. Cel. José Porfírio, 30 - Recreio, Pará
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, R. Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, R. Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 049/2021
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 068/2020
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2019/25445-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 304403/2021-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 304710/2019-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 311550/2023-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 311835/2023-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 406767/2022–0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 428961/2018-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 441257/2023–2
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, v. 958.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178041
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211971238
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298500
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnthropic actions
dc.subjectAquatic plants
dc.subjectLandscape
dc.subjectMacrophyte functional groups
dc.subjectMetacommunity
dc.subjectSpecies' niche
dc.titleBeta diversity of macrophyte life forms: Responses to local, spatial, and land use variables in Amazon aquatic environmentsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4630-3587[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6343-4816[2]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0005-1788-2411[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6188-4386[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5548-4995[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2966-0905[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1264-9304[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0511-3501[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7757-1392[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8150-6078[10]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9416-0758[11]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, São José do Rio Pretopt

Arquivos